[PATCH] pinctrl: pinctrl-imx: fix map setting problem if NO_PAD_CTL
Hui Wang
jason77.wang at gmail.com
Wed Jun 20 03:41:41 EDT 2012
new_map is allocated according to map_num instead of grp->npins,
if a pin or some pins of a group has NO_PAD_CTL property, the map_num
and the grp->npin are different definitely.
When we set mapping information to the new_map[], we should skip those
pins with NO_PAD_CTL from index, otherwise it is possible the driver
will aceesss to a unallocated region.
Cc: Dong Aisheng <dong.aisheng at linaro.org>
Cc: Linus Walleij <linus.walleij at linaro.org>
Cc: Shawn Guo <shawn.guo at linaro.org>
Signed-off-by: Hui Wang <jason77.wang at gmail.com>
---
This problem is easily reproduced if we set pinctrl in the
${board}.dts like following:
fsl,pins = <pin_func_id1 config_with_NO_PAD_CTL
pin_func_id2 config_with_NO_PAD_CTL
pin_func_id3 config_normal>;
drivers/pinctrl/pinctrl-imx.c | 9 +++++----
1 file changed, 5 insertions(+), 4 deletions(-)
diff --git a/drivers/pinctrl/pinctrl-imx.c b/drivers/pinctrl/pinctrl-imx.c
index dd6d93a..0e21abb 100644
--- a/drivers/pinctrl/pinctrl-imx.c
+++ b/drivers/pinctrl/pinctrl-imx.c
@@ -146,6 +146,7 @@ static int imx_dt_node_to_map(struct pinctrl_dev *pctldev,
struct pinctrl_map *new_map;
struct device_node *parent;
int map_num = 1;
+ int map_pos = 0;
int i;
/*
@@ -186,11 +187,11 @@ static int imx_dt_node_to_map(struct pinctrl_dev *pctldev,
new_map++;
for (i = 0; i < grp->npins; i++) {
if (!(grp->configs[i] & IMX_NO_PAD_CTL)) {
- new_map[i].type = PIN_MAP_TYPE_CONFIGS_PIN;
- new_map[i].data.configs.group_or_pin =
+ new_map[map_pos].type = PIN_MAP_TYPE_CONFIGS_PIN;
+ new_map[map_pos].data.configs.group_or_pin =
pin_get_name(pctldev, grp->pins[i]);
- new_map[i].data.configs.configs = &grp->configs[i];
- new_map[i].data.configs.num_configs = 1;
+ new_map[map_pos].data.configs.configs = &grp->configs[i];
+ new_map[map_pos++].data.configs.num_configs = 1;
}
}
--
1.7.11
More information about the linux-arm-kernel
mailing list