[RFC PATCH] ARM: Initial DTS support for Kirkwood GoFlex Net

[Andrew Lunn]

On Tue, Jun 19, 2012 at 02:00:34PM +0000, Arnd Bergmann wrote:
> On Tuesday 19 June 2012, Josh Coombs wrote:
> 
> > +static struct mv643xx_eth_platform_data goflexnet_ge00_data = {
> > +	.phy_addr	= MV643XX_ETH_PHY_ADDR(0),
> > +};
> > +
> > +static struct mv_sata_platform_data goflexnet_sata_data = {
> > +	.n_ports	= 2,
> > +};
> >
> 
> It should not be too hard to let these ones be probed through DT,
> so if nobody has done this yet, maybe you can provide the patches
> to let mv_sata be probed based on a compatible property and
> read the number of ports from a new DT property, as well as 
> use of_phy_connect() to find the right PHY from the "phy-handle"
> property.

I have this, based on Jason's earlier work. I got side tracked
re-writing the GPIO controller/GPIO interrupt code, so have not posted
it yet.

> 
> > +static struct gpio_led goflexnet_led_pins[] = {
> > +	{
> > +		.name			= "status:green:health",
> > +		.default_trigger	= "default-on",
> > +		.gpio			= 46, // 0x4000
> > +		.active_low		= 1,
> > +	},
> > +	{
> > +		.name			= "status:orange:fault",
> > +		.default_trigger	= "none",
> > +		.gpio			= 47, // 0x8000
> > +		.active_low		= 1,
> > +	},
> ...
> > +};
> > +
> > +static struct gpio_led_platform_data goflexnet_led_data = {
> > +	.leds		= goflexnet_led_pins,
> > +	.num_leds	= ARRAY_SIZE(goflexnet_led_pins),
> > +};
> > +
> > +static struct platform_device goflexnet_leds = {
> > +	.name	= "leds-gpio",
> > +	.id	= -1,
> > +	.dev	= {
> > +		.platform_data	= &goflexnet_led_data,
> > +	}
> > +};
> 
> I believe we have gpio DT support in kirkwood now, so these
> can both go away and get replaced with DT descriptions.

What i posted should work, but i've effectively thrown the
implementation away and started again in order to get interrupts
working correctly using an irqdomain. The DT description should
however stay the same.

	Andrew