[PATCH 3/3] ARM: OMAP2+: gpmc: handle additional timings

Tony Lindgren tony at atomide.com
Thu Jun 14 08:29:31 EDT 2012

* Mohammed, Afzal <afzal at ti.com> [120614 05:00]:
> Hi Tony,
> On Thu, Jun 14, 2012 at 17:22:08, Tony Lindgren wrote:
> > * Mohammed, Afzal <afzal at ti.com> [120614 03:43]:
> > > +       t.clk_activation = fclk_offset_ns;
> > > +
> > 
> > This too should be fclk_offset, not fclk_offset_ns.
> As gpmc_cs_set_timing convert it to ticks from ns,
> shouldn't we put it in ns ? 

Hmm I see, something's wrong though.. Some of these we really
want to specify as ticks instead of ns. Your patch was using
1 tick value as 1 ns value, which won't work. When I changed
it back to what I thought was ticks, it just happened to work
probably because of rounding. That's probably the reason why
some of these have been set directly with gpmc_cs_write_reg
as that sets tick values directly.

It seems that we need to still allow both ns and tick values.



More information about the linux-arm-kernel mailing list