[Patch v5 03/13] USB: notify phy when root hub port connect change

[Richard Zhao]

On Wed, Jun 13, 2012 at 02:25:17PM -0400, Alan Stern wrote:
> On Wed, 13 Jun 2012, Richard Zhao wrote:
> 
> > Phy may need to change settings when port connect change.
> > 
> > Signed-off-by: Richard Zhao <richard.zhao at freescale.com>
> > ---
> >  drivers/usb/core/hub.c |    8 ++++++++
> >  1 file changed, 8 insertions(+)
> > 
> > diff --git a/drivers/usb/core/hub.c b/drivers/usb/core/hub.c
> > index 04fb834..e1a6d31 100644
> > --- a/drivers/usb/core/hub.c
> > +++ b/drivers/usb/core/hub.c
> > @@ -20,6 +20,7 @@
> >  #include <linux/usb.h>
> >  #include <linux/usbdevice_fs.h>
> >  #include <linux/usb/hcd.h>
> > +#include <linux/usb/otg.h>
> >  #include <linux/usb/quirks.h>
> >  #include <linux/kthread.h>
> >  #include <linux/mutex.h>
> > @@ -4034,6 +4035,13 @@ static void hub_port_connect_change(struct usb_hub *hub, int port1,
> >  		}
> >  	}
> >  
> > +	if (unlikely(hcd->phy && !hdev->level)) {
> 
> This is okay, but it's more common to test for root hubs with 
> "!hdev->parent".
So it will be like:
if (unlikely(hcd->phy && !hdev->parent)) {

And,
I didn't check (portchange & USB_PORT_STAT_C_CONNECTION), because if
the device is connected on boot, there'll be no USB_PORT_STAT_C_CONNECTION.
Is it acceptable?

Thanks
Richard

> > +		if (portstatus & USB_PORT_STAT_CONNECTION)
> > +			usb_phy_notify_connect(hcd->phy, port1);
> > +		else
> > +			usb_phy_notify_disconnect(hcd->phy, port1);
> > +	}
> > +
> >  	/* Return now if debouncing failed or nothing is connected or
> >  	 * the device was "removed".
> >  	 */
> 
> Alan Stern
> 
>