RFC: changing DMA slave configuration API
Russell King - ARM Linux
linux at arm.linux.org.uk
Sun Jun 10 06:20:23 EDT 2012
Dan, Vinod,
There's a change I would like to do to the DMA slave configuration.
It's currently a pain to have the source and destination parameters in
the dma_slave_config structure as separate elements; it means when you
want to extract them, you end up with code in DMA engine drivers like:
+ if (dir == DMA_DEV_TO_MEM) {
+ dev_addr = c->src_addr;
+ dev_width = c->src_addr_width;
+ burst = c->src_maxburst;
+ } else if (dir == DMA_MEM_TO_DEV) {
+ dev_addr = c->dst_addr;
+ dev_width = c->dst_addr_width;
+ burst = c->dst_maxburst;
+ }
If we redefine the structure as below, this all becomes more simple:
+ if (dir == DMA_DEV_TO_MEM)
+ cfg = &c->dev_src;
+ else if (dir == DMA_MEM_TO_DEV)
+ cfg = &c->dev_dst;
and then we can access the data through cfg->{element} rather than having
to cache each individual elements value in a local variable.
Thoughts?
diff --git a/include/linux/dmaengine.h b/include/linux/dmaengine.h
index 56377df..e6519f7 100644
--- a/include/linux/dmaengine.h
+++ b/include/linux/dmaengine.h
@@ -367,6 +367,18 @@ struct dma_slave_config {
bool device_fc;
};
+struct dma_dev_cfg {
+ dma_addr_t addr;
+ enum dma_slave_buswidth width;
+ u32 maxburst;
+};
+
+struct dma_slave_cfg {
+ struct dma_dev_cfg dev_src;
+ struct dma_dev_cfg dev_dst;
+ bool device_fc;
+};
+
static inline const char *dma_chan_name(struct dma_chan *chan)
{
return dev_name(&chan->dev->device);
More information about the linux-arm-kernel
mailing list