[PATCH-V2 2/2] arm:omap:am33xx: Add power domain data
Paul Walmsley
paul at pwsan.com
Wed Feb 29 20:44:24 EST 2012
Hi
some other observations:
On Sun, 25 Dec 2011, Vaibhav Hiremath wrote:
> +static struct powerdomain per_33xx_pwrdm = {
> + .name = "per_pwrdm",
> + .voltdm = { .name = "core" },
> + .prcm_partition = AM33XX_PRM_PARTITION,
> + .prcm_offs = AM33XX_PRM_PER_MOD,
> + .pwrsts = PWRSTS_OFF_RET_ON,
> + .pwrsts_logic_ret = PWRSTS_OFF_RET,
> + .pwrstctrl_offs = AM33XX_PM_PER_PWRSTCTRL_OFFSET,
> + .pwrstst_offs = AM33XX_PM_PER_PWRSTST_OFFSET,
> + .flags = PWRDM_HAS_LOWPOWERSTATECHANGE,
> + .banks = 3,
> + .pwrsts_mem_ret = {
> + [0] = PWRSTS_OFF_RET, /* icss_mem */
> + [1] = PWRSTS_OFF_RET, /* per_mem */
> + [2] = PWRSTS_OFF_RET, /* ram_mem */
> + },
> + .pwrsts_mem_on = {
> + [0] = PWRSTS_ON, /* icss_mem */
> + [1] = PWRSTS_ON, /* per_mem */
> + [2] = PWRSTS_ON, /* ram_mem */
> + },
> +};
According to SPRUH73C Table 8-184 "PM_PER_PWRSTCTRL Register Field
Descriptions" the pwrsts_mem_on field for RAM_MEM should be
PWRSTS_OFF_RET_ON.
> +static struct powerdomain mpu_33xx_pwrdm = {
> + .name = "mpu_pwrdm",
> + .voltdm = { .name = "mpu" },
> + .prcm_partition = AM33XX_PRM_PARTITION,
> + .prcm_offs = AM33XX_PRM_MPU_MOD,
> + .pwrsts = PWRSTS_OFF_RET_ON,
> + .pwrsts_logic_ret = PWRSTS_OFF_RET,
> + .pwrstctrl_offs = AM33XX_PM_MPU_PWRSTCTRL_OFFSET,
> + .pwrstst_offs = AM33XX_PM_MPU_PWRSTST_OFFSET,
> + .flags = PWRDM_HAS_LOWPOWERSTATECHANGE,
> + .banks = 3,
> + .pwrsts_mem_ret = {
> + [0] = PWRSTS_OFF_RET, /* mpu_l1 */
> + [1] = PWRSTS_OFF_RET, /* mpu_l2 */
> + [2] = PWRSTS_OFF_RET, /* mpu_ram */
> + },
Again SPRUH73C Table 8-191 "PM_MPU_PWRSTCTRL Register Field Descriptions"
claims these should simply by PWRSTS_RET.
> + .pwrsts_mem_on = {
> + [0] = PWRSTS_ON, /* mpu_l1 */
> + [1] = PWRSTS_ON, /* mpu_l2 */
> + [2] = PWRSTS_ON, /* mpu_ram */
> + },
> +};
And the same table claims the MPU_RAM pwrsts_mem_on field should be
PWRSTS_OFF_ON.
Can you please reconcile these differences and let us know which values
should be correct?
thanks
- Paul
More information about the linux-arm-kernel
mailing list