[PATCH v6 1/9] cpuidle: Add common time keeping and irq enabling

[Kevin Hilman]

Robert Lee <rob.lee at linaro.org> writes:

> Make necessary changes to implement time keeping and irq enabling
> in the core cpuidle code.  This will allow the removal of these
> functionalities from various platform cpuidle implementations whose
> timekeeping and irq enabling follows the form in this common code.
>
> Signed-off-by: Robert Lee <rob.lee at linaro.org>
> ---
>  arch/arm/include/asm/cpuidle.h |   14 ++++++
>  drivers/cpuidle/cpuidle.c      |   90 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++--------
>  include/linux/cpuidle.h        |   13 ++++++
>  3 files changed, 99 insertions(+), 18 deletions(-)
>  create mode 100644 arch/arm/include/asm/cpuidle.h
>
> diff --git a/arch/arm/include/asm/cpuidle.h b/arch/arm/include/asm/cpuidle.h
> new file mode 100644
> index 0000000..1d2075b
> --- /dev/null
> +++ b/arch/arm/include/asm/cpuidle.h
> @@ -0,0 +1,14 @@
> +#ifndef __ASM_ARM_CPUIDLE_H
> +#define __ASM_ARM_CPUIDLE_H
> +
> +/* Common ARM WFI state */
> +#define CPUIDLE_ARM_WFI_STATE {\
> +	.enter                  = cpuidle_simple_enter,\
> +	.exit_latency           = 1,\
> +	.target_residency       = 1,\
> +	.flags                  = CPUIDLE_FLAG_TIME_VALID,\
> +	.name                   = "WFI",\
> +	.desc                   = "ARM core clock gating (WFI)",\
> +}

nit: just name this ARM WFI.  Clock gating is platform specific, and
"core" has platform-specific meanings, so in order to keep this truly
generic, I think hat ARM WFI is the best name.

Kevin