linux-next: manual merge of the akpm tree with the arm-soc tree

[Haojian Zhuang]

Hi Stephen & Arnd,

Since there's the conflict on code. Does it mean that I need to re-submit those patches in arm-soc that should be based on commit "drivers/rtc: remove IRQF_DISABLED" from the akpm tree?

Best Regards
Haojian
________________________________________
From: Yong Zhang [yong.zhang0 at gmail.com]
Sent: Wednesday, February 29, 2012 2:32 PM
To: Stephen Rothwell
Cc: Andrew Morton; linux-next at vger.kernel.org; linux-kernel at vger.kernel.org; Haojian Zhuang; Olof Johansson; Arnd Bergmann; linux-arm-kernel at lists.infradead.org
Subject: Re: linux-next: manual merge of the akpm tree with the arm-soc tree

On Wed, Feb 29, 2012 at 05:21:27PM +1100, Stephen Rothwell wrote:
> Hi Andrew,
>
> Today's linux-next merge of the akpm tree got a conflict in
> drivers/rtc/rtc-sa1100.c between commit 3888c09074db ("rtc: sa1100:
> declare irq in resource") from the arm-soc tree and commit "drivers/rtc:
> remove IRQF_DISABLED" from the akpm tree.
>
> I fixed it up (see below) and can carry the fix as necessary.

Your fix looks good to me.

Thanks,
Yong

> --
> Cheers,
> Stephen Rothwell                    sfr at canb.auug.org.au
>
> diff --cc drivers/rtc/rtc-sa1100.c
> index c105774,e70b4e6..0000000
> --- a/drivers/rtc/rtc-sa1100.c
> +++ b/drivers/rtc/rtc-sa1100.c
> @@@ -102,23 -156,20 +102,23 @@@ static irqreturn_t sa1100_rtc_interrupt
>
>   static int sa1100_rtc_open(struct device *dev)
>   {
>  +    struct sa1100_rtc *info = dev_get_drvdata(dev);
>  +    struct rtc_device *rtc = info->rtc;
>       int ret;
>  -    struct platform_device *plat_dev = to_platform_device(dev);
>  -    struct rtc_device *rtc = platform_get_drvdata(plat_dev);
>
>  -    ret = request_irq(IRQ_RTC1Hz, sa1100_rtc_interrupt, 0,
>  +    ret = clk_prepare_enable(info->clk);
>  +    if (ret)
>  +            goto fail_clk;
> -     ret = request_irq(info->irq_1hz, sa1100_rtc_interrupt, IRQF_DISABLED,
> ++    ret = request_irq(info->irq_1hz, sa1100_rtc_interrupt, 0,
>               "rtc 1Hz", dev);
>       if (ret) {
>  -            dev_err(dev, "IRQ %d already in use.\n", IRQ_RTC1Hz);
>  +            dev_err(dev, "IRQ %d already in use.\n", info->irq_1hz);
>               goto fail_ui;
>       }
> -     ret = request_irq(info->irq_alarm, sa1100_rtc_interrupt, IRQF_DISABLED,
>  -    ret = request_irq(IRQ_RTCAlrm, sa1100_rtc_interrupt, 0,
> ++    ret = request_irq(info->irq_alarm, sa1100_rtc_interrupt, 0,
>               "rtc Alrm", dev);
>       if (ret) {
>  -            dev_err(dev, "IRQ %d already in use.\n", IRQ_RTCAlrm);
>  +            dev_err(dev, "IRQ %d already in use.\n", info->irq_alarm);
>               goto fail_ai;
>       }
>       rtc->max_user_freq = RTC_FREQ;



--
Only stand for myself