[PATCH 2/6] gpio/omap: remove saved_wakeup field from struct gpio_bank

[DebBarma, Tarun Kanti]

On Tue, Feb 28, 2012 at 5:20 AM, Kevin Hilman <khilman at ti.com> wrote:
> Tarun Kanti DebBarma <tarun.kanti at ti.com> writes:
>
>> There is no more need to have saved_wakeup. Instead we can use
>> context.wake_en which holds the current wakeup enable register
>> context. This also means that the read from wakeup enable register
>> is not needed.
>>
>> Signed-off-by: Tarun Kanti DebBarma <tarun.kanti at ti.com>
>
> Looks right, but one question below...
>
>> ---
>>  drivers/gpio/gpio-omap.c |   13 ++++---------
>>  1 files changed, 4 insertions(+), 9 deletions(-)
>>
>> diff --git a/drivers/gpio/gpio-omap.c b/drivers/gpio/gpio-omap.c
>> index 40a1fb2..64f15d5 100644
>> --- a/drivers/gpio/gpio-omap.c
>> +++ b/drivers/gpio/gpio-omap.c
>> @@ -54,7 +54,6 @@ struct gpio_bank {
>>       u16 irq;
>>       u16 virtual_irq_start;
>>       u32 suspend_wakeup;
>> -     u32 saved_wakeup;
>>       u32 non_wakeup_gpios;
>>       u32 enabled_non_wakeup_gpios;
>>       struct gpio_regs context;
>> @@ -772,7 +771,7 @@ static int omap_mpuio_suspend_noirq(struct device *dev)
>>       unsigned long           flags;
>>
>>       spin_lock_irqsave(&bank->lock, flags);
>> -     bank->saved_wakeup = __raw_readl(mask_reg);
>> +     bank->context.wake_en = __raw_readl(mask_reg);
>
> Why is this read needed?
Well, we don't really need as we already have context.wake_en updated elsewhere.
I will update this. Thanks.
--
Tarun
>
> Kevin
>
>>       __raw_writel(0xffff & ~bank->suspend_wakeup, mask_reg);
>>       spin_unlock_irqrestore(&bank->lock, flags);
>>