[PATCH v3 0/2] Device tree support for TWL regulators
Grant Likely
grant.likely at secretlab.ca
Mon Feb 27 17:17:21 EST 2012
On Mon, Feb 27, 2012 at 6:52 AM, Cousson, Benoit <b-cousson at ti.com> wrote:
> Hi Mark,
>
>
> On 2/27/2012 2:41 PM, Mark Brown wrote:
>>
>> On Mon, Feb 27, 2012 at 06:01:20PM +0530, Rajendra Nayak wrote:
>>
>>> Depending on what order Mark happens to pull them in, I am fine
>>> re-sending adding support for the 2 twl6030 fixed regulators.
>>
>>
>> Please can you guys come up with a single unified series for this stuff
>> - I'll hold off on applying anything to allow you to do this.
>
>
> The issue is that the initial TWL regulator series from Rajendra will depend
> on the twl core DT support I have that depends on the irq_domain series from
> Grant...
If it depends on the irqdomain tree, then just merge that tree into
yours. That tree is stable now for exactly that reason. You can rely
on it.
git://git.secretlab.ca/git/linux-2.6 irqdomain/next
g.
More information about the linux-arm-kernel
mailing list