[PATCH v2] USB: Support for LPC32xx SoC

[Wolfram Sang]

> I would recomment telling this from the device itself rather than from the
> platform.

Basically yes...

> Unfortunately, the way that ohci handles the abstraction between the
> various implementations is backwards, it would be much easier if the
> main driver was following that model to start with.

... exactly for that reason I didn't suggest it. Looking at other ohci-sources
(e.g. ohci-omap.c), machine_is_* seems to be the consistent use-case.

Thanks,

   Wolfram

-- 
Pengutronix e.K.                           | Wolfram Sang                |
Industrial Linux Solutions                 | http://www.pengutronix.de/  |
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: signature.asc
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 198 bytes
Desc: Digital signature
URL: <http://lists.infradead.org/pipermail/linux-arm-kernel/attachments/20120225/4e25fede/attachment.sig>