[PATCH v3 13/21] ARM: at91/rtc-at91sam9: each SoC can select the RTT device to use
Nicolas Ferre
nicolas.ferre at atmel.com
Thu Feb 23 09:25:57 EST 2012
From: Jean-Christophe PLAGNIOL-VILLARD <plagnioj at jcrosoft.com>
For the RTT as RTC driver rtc-at91sam9, the platform_device structure
is filled during SoC initialization. This will allow to convert this
RTC driver as a standard platform driver.
Signed-off-by: Jean-Christophe PLAGNIOL-VILLARD <plagnioj at jcrosoft.com>
Acked-by: Nicolas Ferre <nicolas.ferre at atmel.com>
---
arch/arm/mach-at91/at91sam9260_devices.c | 11 +++++
arch/arm/mach-at91/at91sam9261_devices.c | 10 +++++
arch/arm/mach-at91/at91sam9263_devices.c | 25 ++++++++++++
arch/arm/mach-at91/at91sam9g45_devices.c | 10 +++++
arch/arm/mach-at91/at91sam9rl_devices.c | 10 +++++
drivers/rtc/rtc-at91sam9.c | 61 ++++-------------------------
6 files changed, 75 insertions(+), 52 deletions(-)
diff --git a/arch/arm/mach-at91/at91sam9260_devices.c b/arch/arm/mach-at91/at91sam9260_devices.c
index b93a337..2071017 100644
--- a/arch/arm/mach-at91/at91sam9260_devices.c
+++ b/arch/arm/mach-at91/at91sam9260_devices.c
@@ -728,8 +728,19 @@ static struct platform_device at91sam9260_rtt_device = {
.num_resources = ARRAY_SIZE(rtt_resources),
};
+
+#if IS_ENABLED(CONFIG_RTC_DRV_AT91SAM9)
+static void __init at91_add_device_rtt_rtc(void)
+{
+ at91sam9260_rtt_device.name = "rtc-at91sam9";
+}
+#else
+static void __init at91_add_device_rtt_rtc(void) {}
+#endif
+
static void __init at91_add_device_rtt(void)
{
+ at91_add_device_rtt_rtc();
platform_device_register(&at91sam9260_rtt_device);
}
diff --git a/arch/arm/mach-at91/at91sam9261_devices.c b/arch/arm/mach-at91/at91sam9261_devices.c
index 52c1f1a..b3ceb97 100644
--- a/arch/arm/mach-at91/at91sam9261_devices.c
+++ b/arch/arm/mach-at91/at91sam9261_devices.c
@@ -614,8 +614,18 @@ static struct platform_device at91sam9261_rtt_device = {
.num_resources = ARRAY_SIZE(rtt_resources),
};
+#if IS_ENABLED(CONFIG_RTC_DRV_AT91SAM9)
+static void __init at91_add_device_rtt_rtc(void)
+{
+ at91sam9261_rtt_device.name = "rtc-at91sam9";
+}
+#else
+static void __init at91_add_device_rtt_rtc(void) {}
+#endif
+
static void __init at91_add_device_rtt(void)
{
+ at91_add_device_rtt_rtc();
platform_device_register(&at91sam9261_rtt_device);
}
diff --git a/arch/arm/mach-at91/at91sam9263_devices.c b/arch/arm/mach-at91/at91sam9263_devices.c
index 545826b..b4a6adb 100644
--- a/arch/arm/mach-at91/at91sam9263_devices.c
+++ b/arch/arm/mach-at91/at91sam9263_devices.c
@@ -992,8 +992,33 @@ static struct platform_device at91sam9263_rtt1_device = {
.num_resources = ARRAY_SIZE(rtt1_resources),
};
+#if IS_ENABLED(CONFIG_RTC_DRV_AT91SAM9)
+static void __init at91_add_device_rtt_rtc(void)
+{
+ struct platform_device *pdev;
+
+ switch (CONFIG_RTC_DRV_AT91SAM9_RTT) {
+ case 0:
+ pdev = &at91sam9263_rtt0_device;
+ break;
+ case 1:
+ pdev = &at91sam9263_rtt1_device;
+ break;
+ default:
+ pr_err("at91sam9263: support only 2 RTT (%d)\n",
+ CONFIG_RTC_DRV_AT91SAM9_RTT);
+ return;
+ }
+
+ pdev->name = "rtc-at91sam9";
+}
+#else
+static void __init at91_add_device_rtt_rtc(void) {}
+#endif
+
static void __init at91_add_device_rtt(void)
{
+ at91_add_device_rtt_rtc();
platform_device_register(&at91sam9263_rtt0_device);
platform_device_register(&at91sam9263_rtt1_device);
}
diff --git a/arch/arm/mach-at91/at91sam9g45_devices.c b/arch/arm/mach-at91/at91sam9g45_devices.c
index 8c036ff..81d1adf 100644
--- a/arch/arm/mach-at91/at91sam9g45_devices.c
+++ b/arch/arm/mach-at91/at91sam9g45_devices.c
@@ -1204,8 +1204,18 @@ static struct platform_device at91sam9g45_rtt_device = {
.num_resources = ARRAY_SIZE(rtt_resources),
};
+#if IS_ENABLED(CONFIG_RTC_DRV_AT91SAM9)
+static void __init at91_add_device_rtt_rtc(void)
+{
+ at91sam9g45_rtt_device.name = "rtc-at91sam9";
+}
+#else
+static void __init at91_add_device_rtt_rtc(void) {}
+#endif
+
static void __init at91_add_device_rtt(void)
{
+ at91_add_device_rtt_rtc();
platform_device_register(&at91sam9g45_rtt_device);
}
diff --git a/arch/arm/mach-at91/at91sam9rl_devices.c b/arch/arm/mach-at91/at91sam9rl_devices.c
index 936cf20..dd248c8 100644
--- a/arch/arm/mach-at91/at91sam9rl_devices.c
+++ b/arch/arm/mach-at91/at91sam9rl_devices.c
@@ -693,8 +693,18 @@ static struct platform_device at91sam9rl_rtt_device = {
.num_resources = ARRAY_SIZE(rtt_resources),
};
+#if IS_ENABLED(CONFIG_RTC_DRV_AT91SAM9)
+static void __init at91_add_device_rtt_rtc(void)
+{
+ at91sam9rl_rtt_device.name = "rtc-at91sam9";
+}
+#else
+static void __init at91_add_device_rtt_rtc(void) {}
+#endif
+
static void __init at91_add_device_rtt(void)
{
+ at91_add_device_rtt_rtc();
platform_device_register(&at91sam9rl_rtt_device);
}
diff --git a/drivers/rtc/rtc-at91sam9.c b/drivers/rtc/rtc-at91sam9.c
index a3ad957..65896a3 100644
--- a/drivers/rtc/rtc-at91sam9.c
+++ b/drivers/rtc/rtc-at91sam9.c
@@ -287,7 +287,7 @@ static const struct rtc_class_ops at91_rtc_ops = {
/*
* Initialize and install RTC driver
*/
-static int __init at91_rtc_probe(struct platform_device *pdev)
+static int __devinit at91_rtc_probe(struct platform_device *pdev)
{
struct resource *r;
struct sam9_rtc *rtc;
@@ -360,7 +360,7 @@ fail:
/*
* Disable and remove the RTC driver
*/
-static int __exit at91_rtc_remove(struct platform_device *pdev)
+static int __devexit at91_rtc_remove(struct platform_device *pdev)
{
struct sam9_rtc *rtc = platform_get_drvdata(pdev);
u32 mr = rtt_readl(rtc, MR);
@@ -433,63 +433,20 @@ static int at91_rtc_resume(struct platform_device *pdev)
#endif
static struct platform_driver at91_rtc_driver = {
- .driver.name = "rtc-at91sam9",
- .driver.owner = THIS_MODULE,
- .remove = __exit_p(at91_rtc_remove),
+ .probe = at91_rtc_probe,
+ .remove = __devexit_p(at91_rtc_remove),
.shutdown = at91_rtc_shutdown,
.suspend = at91_rtc_suspend,
.resume = at91_rtc_resume,
+ .driver = {
+ .name = "rtc-at91sam9",
+ .owner = THIS_MODULE,
+ },
};
-/* Chips can have more than one RTT module, and they can be used for more
- * than just RTCs. So we can't just register as "the" RTT driver.
- *
- * A normal approach in such cases is to create a library to allocate and
- * free the modules. Here we just use bus_find_device() as like such a
- * library, binding directly ... no runtime "library" footprint is needed.
- */
-static int __init at91_rtc_match(struct device *dev, void *v)
-{
- struct platform_device *pdev = to_platform_device(dev);
- int ret;
-
- /* continue searching if this isn't the RTT we need */
- if (strcmp("at91_rtt", pdev->name) != 0
- || pdev->id != CONFIG_RTC_DRV_AT91SAM9_RTT)
- goto fail;
-
- /* else we found it ... but fail unless we can bind to the RTC driver */
- if (dev->driver) {
- dev_dbg(dev, "busy, can't use as RTC!\n");
- goto fail;
- }
- dev->driver = &at91_rtc_driver.driver;
- if (device_attach(dev) == 0) {
- dev_dbg(dev, "can't attach RTC!\n");
- goto fail;
- }
- ret = at91_rtc_probe(pdev);
- if (ret == 0)
- return true;
-
- dev_dbg(dev, "RTC probe err %d!\n", ret);
-fail:
- return false;
-}
-
static int __init at91_rtc_init(void)
{
- int status;
- struct device *rtc;
-
- status = platform_driver_register(&at91_rtc_driver);
- if (status)
- return status;
- rtc = bus_find_device(&platform_bus_type, NULL,
- NULL, at91_rtc_match);
- if (!rtc)
- platform_driver_unregister(&at91_rtc_driver);
- return rtc ? 0 : -ENODEV;
+ return platform_driver_register(&at91_rtc_driver);
}
module_init(at91_rtc_init);
--
1.7.9
More information about the linux-arm-kernel
mailing list