[PATCH v2 11/19] ARM: at91/PMC: make register base soc independent

[Ryan Mallon]

On 22/02/12 20:39, Nicolas Ferre wrote:

> From: Jean-Christophe PLAGNIOL-VILLARD <plagnioj at jcrosoft.com>
> 
> Signed-off-by: Jean-Christophe PLAGNIOL-VILLARD <plagnioj at jcrosoft.com>
> Acked-by: Nicolas Ferre <nicolas.ferre at atmel.com>
> Reviewed-by: Ryan Mallon <rmallon at gmail.com>
> ---

<snip>

> -	seq_printf(s, "SCSR = %8x\n", scsr = at91_sys_read(AT91_PMC_SCSR));
> -	seq_printf(s, "PCSR = %8x\n", pcsr = at91_sys_read(AT91_PMC_PCSR));
> -	seq_printf(s, "MOR  = %8x\n", at91_sys_read(AT91_CKGR_MOR));
> -	seq_printf(s, "MCFR = %8x\n", at91_sys_read(AT91_CKGR_MCFR));
> -	seq_printf(s, "PLLA = %8x\n", at91_sys_read(AT91_CKGR_PLLAR));
> +	seq_printf(s, "SCSR = %8x\n", scsr = at91_pmc_read(AT91_PMC_SCSR));
> +	seq_printf(s, "PCSR = %8x\n", pcsr = at91_pmc_read(AT91_PMC_PCSR));


I realise the original code is wrong, so doesn't need to be fixed in
this patch, but can we please move the assignments out of the seq_printf
calls.

<snip>

>  void __init at91_ioremap_ramc(int id, u32 addr, u32 size)
> @@ -208,7 +207,7 @@ void __init at91_ioremap_ramc(int id, u32 addr, u32 size)
>  	}
>  	at91_ramc_base[id] = ioremap(addr, size);
>  	if (!at91_ramc_base[id])
> -		pr_warn("Impossible to ioremap ramc.%d 0x%x\n", id, addr);
> +		panic("Impossible to ioremap ramc.%d 0x%x\n", id, addr);


This is in the wrong patch, and should be folded into the correct patch.

~Ryan