[PATCH v3 0/3] MFD: twl6040: Conversion to i2c driver

[Peter Ujfalusi]

Hi Samuel,

On 02/20/2012 09:47 PM, Samuel Ortiz wrote:
> Hi Peter,
> 
> On Fri, Feb 10, 2012 at 12:00:15PM +0200, Peter Ujfalusi wrote:
>> Hello,
>>
>> Changes since v2:
>> - soc/codec/Kconfig: make twl6040 depend on I2C
>> - Regulator related patches has been removed (to be sent as separate series)
> I applied all 3 patches. Patch #2 did not apply cleanly, due to the fact that
> several struct twl4030_codec_data omap4panda.c references are not upstream
> yet. This is my .rej:

The Panda audio support is going via sound tree. It is in linux-next
already for couple of weeks now. The reason you have this reject is that
you don't have the audio support for Panda series, and a such upstream
does not have it either :( It is for 3.4 also.

> --- arch/arm/mach-omap2/board-omap4panda.c
> +++ arch/arm/mach-omap2/board-omap4panda.c
> @@ -278,7 +279,7 @@
>  	return 0;
>  }
>  
> -static struct twl4030_codec_data twl6040_codec = {
> +static struct twl6040_codec_data twl6040_codec = {
>  	/* single-step ramp for headset and handsfree */
>  	.hs_left_step	= 0x0f,
>  	.hs_right_step	= 0x0f,
> @@ -286,17 +287,14 @@
>  	.hf_right_step	= 0x1d,
>  };
>  
> -static struct twl4030_audio_data twl6040_audio = {
> +static struct twl6040_platform_data twl6040_data = {
>  	.codec		= &twl6040_codec,
>  	.audpwron_gpio	= 127,
> -	.naudint_irq	= OMAP44XX_IRQ_SYS_2N,
>  	.irq_base	= TWL6040_CODEC_IRQ_BASE,
>  };
>  
>  /* Panda board uses the common PMIC configuration */
> -static struct twl4030_platform_data omap4_panda_twldata = {
> -	.audio		= &twl6040_audio,
> -};
> +static struct twl4030_platform_data omap4_panda_twldata;
> 
> I'm not sure hwo we could handle that properly. Either by letting Tony
> carrying this patchset, or by sending me the panda patch that adds those
> structures. As you prefer.

If Liam would take this series that would be probably the way forward.
If he does not have objections.
Liam: I can create a branch for you to pull from as soon as all other
patch receives the needed acks...

Samuel: if Liam agrees is it possible for you to drop the twl6040
related patches from your for-next branch?

Thank you,
Péter