[PATCH v5 00/27] irq_domain generalization and rework
Andrew Morton
akpm at linux-foundation.org
Thu Feb 16 17:52:19 EST 2012
On Thu, 16 Feb 2012 02:09:01 -0700
Grant Likely <grant.likely at secretlab.ca> wrote:
>
> This series generalizes the "irq_host" infrastructure from powerpc
> so that it can be used by all architectures and renames it to "irq_domain".
drivers/mfd/twl-core.c is fairly horked on i386 allmodconfig:
drivers/mfd/twl-core.c: In function 'twl_probe':
drivers/mfd/twl-core.c:1218: error: implicit declaration of function 'irq_alloc_descs'
drivers/mfd/twl-core.c:1226: error: implicit declaration of function 'irq_domain_add_legacy'
drivers/mfd/twl-core.c:1227: error: 'irq_domain_simple_ops' undeclared (first use in this function)
drivers/mfd/twl-core.c:1227: error: (Each undeclared identifier is reported only once
drivers/mfd/twl-core.c:1227: error: for each function it appears in.)
This is today's linux-next so it has rmk's "ARM: omap: fix broken
twl-core dependencies and ifdefs" in there, which looks like it
attempts to repair this stuff.
It's looking for things which are in both linux/irq.h and in
linux/irqdomain.h.
btw, Russell, regarding this comment in include/linux/irq.h:
/*
* Please do not include this file in generic code. There is currently
* no requirement for any architecture to implement anything held
* within this file.
*
* Thanks. --rmk
*/
A quick grep indicates that we've lost this battle ;) Is the comments
still true? Should we stop discouraging inclusion of linux/irq.h?
Does anyone even know that it's discouraged ;)
More information about the linux-arm-kernel
mailing list