[PATCH v7] ARM: net: JIT compiler for packet filters
Mircea Gherzan
mgherzan at gmail.com
Mon Feb 13 10:36:29 EST 2012
Hi,
Am 07.01.2012 12:52, schrieb Mircea Gherzan:
> Based of Matt Evans's PPC64 implementation.
>
> The compiler generates ARM instructions but interworking is
> supported for Thumb2 kernels.
>
> Supports both little and big endian. Unaligned loads are emitted
> for ARMv6+. Not all the BPF opcodes that deal with ancillary data
> are supported. The scratch memory of the filter lives on the stack.
> Hardware integer division is used if it is available.
>
> Enabled in the same way as for x86-64 and PPC64:
>
> echo 1 > /proc/sys/net/core/bpf_jit_enable
>
> A value greater than 1 enables opcode output.
>
> Signed-off-by: Mircea Gherzan <mgherzan at gmail.com>
> ---
>
> Changes in v7:
> * fix the intruction generation for LDX_MSH, OR_X, LSH_K,
> RSH_K and JMP_JA
> * fix the condition for saving the A register
> * use fls() instead of the compiler builtin
> * punt to the interpreter on absolute loads with K < 0
> * check for invalid data references
> * support the NEG opcode
> * clear X in the prologue based on a context flag
> * simplify the conditional jumps
>
> Changes in v6:
> * fix the code generation for the ANC_CPU opcode
>
> Changes in v5:
> * replace SEEN_LEN with SEEN_SKB
> * set ctx->seen when handling some ancillary data opcodes
>
> Changes in v4:
> * first check if the JIT compiler is enabled
> * fix the code generation for the LDX_MSH opcode
>
> Changes in v3:
> * no longer depend on EABI and !Thumb2
> * add BLX "emulation" for ARMv4 without Thumb
> * use the integer divide instruction on Cortex-A15
> * fix the handling of the DIV_K opcode
> * use a C wrapper for __aeabi_uidiv
> * fix the generation of the epilogue (non-FP case)
>
> Changes in v2:
> * enable the compiler only for ARMv5+ because of the BLX instruction
> * use the same comparison for the ARM version checks
> * use misaligned accesses on ARMv6
> * fix the SEEN_MEM
> * fix the mem_words_used()
>
> arch/arm/Kconfig | 1 +
> arch/arm/Makefile | 1 +
> arch/arm/net/Makefile | 3 +
> arch/arm/net/bpf_jit_32.c | 912 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
> arch/arm/net/bpf_jit_32.h | 190 ++++++++++
> 5 files changed, 1107 insertions(+), 0 deletions(-)
> create mode 100644 arch/arm/net/Makefile
> create mode 100644 arch/arm/net/bpf_jit_32.c
> create mode 100644 arch/arm/net/bpf_jit_32.h
Gentle ping. This patch has been in the tracking system for over a
month. Is there any reason not to apply it in arm/for-next?
Thanks,
Mircea
More information about the linux-arm-kernel
mailing list