[PATCH] ep93xx: fix build of vision_ep93xx.c

[Arnd Bergmann]

On Friday 10 February 2012, H Hartley Sweeten wrote:
> On Thursday, February 09, 2012 11:47 PM, Mika Westerberg wrote:
> > On Wed, Feb 08, 2012 at 09:53:44AM -0700, H Hartley Sweeten wrote:
> >> Fix build breakage due to the following commits:
> >> 
> >> Commit bd5f12a24766c1f299def0a78b008d4746f528f2
> >>   ARM: 7042/3: mach-ep93xx: break out GPIO driver specifics
> >> 
> >> Commit 257af9f9725aa8a863b306659208a031135d59e7
> >>   ARM: 7041/1: gpio-ep93xx: hookup the to_irq callback in the driver
> >> 
> >> The vision_ep9307 machine uses the ep93xx build-in gpios and needs to
> >> include <mach/gpio-ep93xx.h> to pickup the defines.
> >> 
> >> The gpio_to_irq() call is now a callback to the gpio-ep93xx.c driver
> >> and cannot be used as a constant initializer for the .irq member of
> >> struct i2c_board_info.
> >> 
> >> Signed-off-by: Hartley Sweeten <hsweeten at visionengravers.com>
> >> Acked-by: Ryan Mallon <rmallon at gmail.com>
> >
> > Acked-by: Mika Westerberg <mika.westerberg at iki.fi>
> 
> Russell,
> 
> Can this go to your Patch system or should it go thru the arm-soc tree?
> 
> The 3.2 kernel will not currently build with CONFIG_MACH_VISION_EP9307=y
> and needs this patch.

Hi Hartley, Ryan and Mika,

It should indeed go through the arm-soc tree, I'm sorry for having
been so unresponsive recently. Olof was taking care of the other
pull requests and bug fixes but unfortunately was not on Cc on this
one, so we both ended up missing it until now.

I've applied it on the "fixes" branch of the arm-soc tree now, it
will get sent to Linus on the next opportunity.

I had a little trouble applying the patch from base64 format, but
since you've had to wait so long already and I'm not completely sure
which side the problem was on I took the time to recreate the diff
from the base64 encoding and fix up the whitespace damage I got.

	Arnd