[PATCH V3 1/1] dt: add of_get_child_count helper function
Sergei Shtylyov
sshtylyov at mvista.com
Sat Feb 11 15:37:46 EST 2012
Hello.
On 11-02-2012 21:22, Dong Aisheng wrote:
> Currently most code to get child count in kernel are almost same,
> add a helper to implement this function for dt to use.
> Signed-off-by: Dong Aisheng<dong.aisheng at linaro.org>
> Cc: Grant Likely<grant.likely at secretlab.ca>
> Cc: Rob Herring<rob.herring at calxeda.com>
> ---
> Hi Rob,
> Since my imx pinctrl driver series still depends on the pinctrl core dt
> binding patch which is still not in mainline, i'd like this pure dt patch
> go separately first in case others want to use.
> changes v2->v3:
> Addressed some people's comments:
> * do not use assignment as expression
> * return 0 for non-dt case
> Changes v1->v2:
> * change the name from of_get_child_number to of_get_child_count
> ---
> include/linux/of.h | 16 ++++++++++++++++
> 1 files changed, 16 insertions(+), 0 deletions(-)
> diff --git a/include/linux/of.h b/include/linux/of.h
> index a75a831..ae242ef 100644
> --- a/include/linux/of.h
> +++ b/include/linux/of.h
> @@ -195,6 +195,17 @@ extern struct device_node *of_get_next_child(const struct device_node *node,
> for (child = of_get_next_child(parent, NULL); child != NULL; \
> child = of_get_next_child(parent, child))
>
> +static inline int of_get_child_count(const struct device_node *np)
> +{
> + struct device_node *child = NULL;
> + int num = 0;
> +
> + while ((child = of_get_next_child(np, child)) != NULL)
Doesn't scripts/checkpatch.pl complain here?
> + num++;
> +
> + return num;
> +}
> +
WBR, Sergei
More information about the linux-arm-kernel
mailing list