[PATCH v4 2/4] irq: add irq_domain support to generic-chip
Rob Herring
robherring2 at gmail.com
Wed Feb 8 11:49:26 EST 2012
On 02/08/2012 01:15 AM, Shawn Guo wrote:
> On Mon, Feb 06, 2012 at 10:54:56PM -0600, Rob Herring wrote:
> ...
>> I've pushed a v5 branch. Can you please test it out on mx51.
>>
> Unfortunately, it still does not work. The following are the changes
> I made to get it work for both non-dt and dt boot.
>
> Since you do not have hardware to test, I would suggest you leave the
> tzic changes to me. I would post a series to migrate tzic and gpio-mxc
> shortly after your series becomes stable, and you can fold it into your
> series if it looks good to you then.
Certainly fine by me. My plan is to send this to Grant.
> BTW, the arch/arm/mach-mx5 folder has been merged into mach-imx since
> 3.3-rc2. The following changes are based on a merging of your branch
> into 3.3-rc2.
>
> ---8<-----
> diff --git a/arch/arm/boot/dts/imx51.dtsi b/arch/arm/boot/dts/imx51.dtsi
> index 6663986..a5fda43 100644
> --- a/arch/arm/boot/dts/imx51.dtsi
> +++ b/arch/arm/boot/dts/imx51.dtsi
> @@ -171,6 +171,12 @@
> status = "disabled";
> };
>
> + gpt at 73fa0000 {
> + compatible = "fsl,imx51-gpt", "fsl,gpt";
> + reg = <0x73fa0000 0x4000>;
> + interrupts = <39>;
> + };
> +
> uart1: uart at 73fbc000 {
> compatible = "fsl,imx51-uart", "fsl,imx21-uart";
> reg = <0x73fbc000 0x4000>;
> diff --git a/arch/arm/mach-imx/clock-mx51-mx53.c b/arch/arm/mach-imx/clock-mx51-mx53.c
> index 0847050..4f2dc66 100644
> --- a/arch/arm/mach-imx/clock-mx51-mx53.c
> +++ b/arch/arm/mach-imx/clock-mx51-mx53.c
> @@ -16,6 +16,7 @@
> #include <linux/io.h>
> #include <linux/clkdev.h>
> #include <linux/of.h>
> +#include <linux/of_irq.h>
>
> #include <asm/div64.h>
>
> @@ -1555,10 +1556,12 @@ static void clk_tree_init(void)
> __raw_writel(reg, MXC_CCM_CBCDR);
> }
>
> +static int get_timer_irq(void);
> +
> int __init mx51_clocks_init(unsigned long ckil, unsigned long osc,
> unsigned long ckih1, unsigned long ckih2)
> {
> - int i;
> + int i, gpt_irq;
>
> external_low_reference = ckil;
> external_high_reference = ckih1;
> @@ -1592,6 +1595,9 @@ int __init mx51_clocks_init(unsigned long ckil, unsigned long osc,
> clk_set_rate(&esdhc2_clk, 166250000);
>
> /* System timer */
> + gpt_irq = get_timer_irq();
> + if (!gpt_irq)
> + gpt_irq = MX51_INT_GPT;
> mxc_timer_init(&gpt_clk, MX51_IO_ADDRESS(MX51_GPT1_BASE_ADDR),
> MX51_INT_GPT);
> return 0;
> @@ -1600,7 +1606,7 @@ int __init mx51_clocks_init(unsigned long ckil, unsigned long osc,
> int __init mx53_clocks_init(unsigned long ckil, unsigned long osc,
> unsigned long ckih1, unsigned long ckih2)
> {
> - int i;
> + int i, gpt_irq;
>
> external_low_reference = ckil;
> external_high_reference = ckih1;
> @@ -1629,8 +1635,11 @@ int __init mx53_clocks_init(unsigned long ckil, unsigned long osc,
> clk_set_rate(&esdhc3_mx53_clk, 200000000);
>
> /* System timer */
> + gpt_irq = get_timer_irq();
> + if (!gpt_irq)
> + gpt_irq = MX53_INT_GPT;
> mxc_timer_init(&gpt_clk, MX53_IO_ADDRESS(MX53_GPT1_BASE_ADDR),
> - MX53_INT_GPT);
> + gpt_irq);
> return 0;
> }
>
> @@ -1672,4 +1681,15 @@ int __init mx53_clocks_init_dt(void)
> clk_get_freq_dt(&ckil, &osc, &ckih1, &ckih2);
> return mx53_clocks_init(ckil, osc, ckih1, ckih2);
> }
> +
> +static inline int get_timer_irq(void)
> +{
> + return irq_of_parse_and_map(
> + of_find_compatible_node(NULL, NULL, "fsl,gpt"), 0);
> +}
> +#else
> +static inline int get_timer_irq(void)
> +{
> + return 0;
> +}
> #endif
> diff --git a/arch/arm/mach-imx/imx51-dt.c b/arch/arm/mach-imx/imx51-dt.c
> index cc4bb16..98eb415 100644
> --- a/arch/arm/mach-imx/imx51-dt.c
> +++ b/arch/arm/mach-imx/imx51-dt.c
> @@ -12,6 +12,7 @@
>
> #include <linux/irq.h>
> #include <linux/irqdomain.h>
> +#include <linux/of_address.h>
> #include <linux/of_irq.h>
> #include <linux/of_platform.h>
> #include <asm/mach/arch.h>
> diff --git a/arch/arm/plat-mxc/tzic.c b/arch/arm/plat-mxc/tzic.c
> index 1962188..def0090 100644
> --- a/arch/arm/plat-mxc/tzic.c
> +++ b/arch/arm/plat-mxc/tzic.c
> @@ -167,7 +167,9 @@ void __init tzic_init_irq(void __iomem *irqbase)
>
> /* all IRQ no FIQ Warning :: No selection */
>
> - irq_setup_generic_chip_domain("tzic", NULL, 1, 0, tzic_base,
> + irq_setup_generic_chip_domain("tzic",
> + of_find_compatible_node(NULL, NULL, "fsl,tzic"),
> + 1, 0, tzic_base,
> handle_level_irq, TZIC_NUM_IRQS, 0,
> IRQ_NOREQUEST, 0,
> tzic_init_gc, &tzic_extra_irq);
> diff --git a/include/linux/of.h b/include/linux/of.h
> index a75a831..92cf6ad 100644
> --- a/include/linux/of.h
> +++ b/include/linux/of.h
> @@ -281,6 +281,14 @@ static inline struct property *of_find_property(const struct device_node *np,
> return NULL;
> }
>
> +static inline struct device_node *of_find_compatible_node(
> + struct device_node *from,
> + const char *type,
> + const char *compat)
> +{
> + return NULL;
> +}
> +
> static inline int of_property_read_u32_array(const struct device_node *np,
> const char *propname,
> u32 *out_values, size_t sz)
> diff --git a/kernel/irq/generic-chip.c b/kernel/irq/generic-chip.c
> index fed1cf7..c9e7a58 100644
> --- a/kernel/irq/generic-chip.c
> +++ b/kernel/irq/generic-chip.c
> @@ -291,7 +291,7 @@ static int irq_gc_irq_domain_map(struct irq_domain *d, unsigned int irq,
>
> static const struct irq_domain_ops irq_gc_irq_domain_ops = {
> .map = irq_gc_irq_domain_map,
> - .xlate = irq_domain_xlate_twocell,
> + .xlate = irq_domain_xlate_onetwocell,
> };
>
> /*
> @@ -344,13 +344,6 @@ int irq_setup_generic_chip_domain(const char *name, struct device_node *node,
> gc_init_cb(gc[i]);
>
> irq_setup_generic_chip(gc[i], 0, flags, clr, set);
> - if (node)
> - continue;
> -
> - /* Additional setup for legacy domains */
> - for (hwirq = 0; hwirq < 32; irq_base++, hwirq++)
> - irq_get_irq_data(irq_base)->hwirq =
> - gc[i]->hwirq_base + hwirq;
> }
>
> if (node)
> ---->8----
>
>> Grant, is there some reason a legacy domain cannot setup the
>> irq_data.hwirq itself? No other code should be setting this up.
>>
> I'm not sure this is true, since it works for my non-dt case with your
> 'Addtional setup ...' code above removed.
Ahh, right.
Rob
More information about the linux-arm-kernel
mailing list