[PATCH] ARM: cache-v7: Disable preemption when reading CCSIDR

Nicolas Pitre nico at fluxnic.net
Thu Feb 2 22:04:04 EST 2012


On Thu, 2 Feb 2012, Stephen Boyd wrote:

> On 02/02/12 18:35, Nicolas Pitre wrote:
> > On Thu, 2 Feb 2012, Stephen Boyd wrote:
> >> On 02/02/12 17:18, Nicolas Pitre wrote:
> >>> If you simply disable/restore IRQs around the critical region then you 
> >>> don't have to worry about __v7_setup.  Plus this will allow for 
> >>> v7_flush_dcache_all to still be callable from atomic context.
> >> Ok. Here's a patch. I still need to test it. I'll send another patch
> >> series to cleanup the get_thread_info stuff (there's two of them?).
> >>
> >>  arch/arm/mm/cache-v7.S |    6 ++++++
> >>  1 files changed, 6 insertions(+), 0 deletions(-)
> >>
> >> diff --git a/arch/arm/mm/cache-v7.S b/arch/arm/mm/cache-v7.S
> >> index 07c4bc8..654a5fc 100644
> >> --- a/arch/arm/mm/cache-v7.S
> >> +++ b/arch/arm/mm/cache-v7.S
> >> @@ -54,9 +54,15 @@ loop1:
> >>  	and	r1, r1, #7			@ mask of the bits for current cache only
> >>  	cmp	r1, #2				@ see what cache we have at this level
> >>  	blt	skip				@ skip if no cache, or just i-cache
> >> +#ifdef CONFIG_PREEMPT
> >> +	save_and_disable_irqs r9		@ make cssr&csidr read atomic
> >> +#endif
> >>  	mcr	p15, 2, r10, c0, c0, 0		@ select current cache level in cssr
> >>  	isb					@ isb to sych the new cssr&csidr
> >>  	mrc	p15, 1, r1, c0, c0, 0		@ read the new csidr
> >> +#ifdef CONFIG_PREEMPT
> >> +	restore_irqs r9
> >> +#endif
> > I'd suggest using restore_irqs_notrace instead.  The IRQ-off period is 
> > so small that there is no point tracing it.
> 
> Thanks. I'll make sure to do that before uploading to the patch tracker.

Might be worth flagging this for the stable kernels as well
(CC: stable at kernel.org).


Nicolas



More information about the linux-arm-kernel mailing list