[PATCH] ARM: cache-v7: Disable preemption when reading CCSIDR
Nicolas Pitre
nico at fluxnic.net
Thu Feb 2 22:04:04 EST 2012
On Thu, 2 Feb 2012, Stephen Boyd wrote:
> On 02/02/12 18:35, Nicolas Pitre wrote:
> > On Thu, 2 Feb 2012, Stephen Boyd wrote:
> >> On 02/02/12 17:18, Nicolas Pitre wrote:
> >>> If you simply disable/restore IRQs around the critical region then you
> >>> don't have to worry about __v7_setup. Plus this will allow for
> >>> v7_flush_dcache_all to still be callable from atomic context.
> >> Ok. Here's a patch. I still need to test it. I'll send another patch
> >> series to cleanup the get_thread_info stuff (there's two of them?).
> >>
> >> arch/arm/mm/cache-v7.S | 6 ++++++
> >> 1 files changed, 6 insertions(+), 0 deletions(-)
> >>
> >> diff --git a/arch/arm/mm/cache-v7.S b/arch/arm/mm/cache-v7.S
> >> index 07c4bc8..654a5fc 100644
> >> --- a/arch/arm/mm/cache-v7.S
> >> +++ b/arch/arm/mm/cache-v7.S
> >> @@ -54,9 +54,15 @@ loop1:
> >> and r1, r1, #7 @ mask of the bits for current cache only
> >> cmp r1, #2 @ see what cache we have at this level
> >> blt skip @ skip if no cache, or just i-cache
> >> +#ifdef CONFIG_PREEMPT
> >> + save_and_disable_irqs r9 @ make cssr&csidr read atomic
> >> +#endif
> >> mcr p15, 2, r10, c0, c0, 0 @ select current cache level in cssr
> >> isb @ isb to sych the new cssr&csidr
> >> mrc p15, 1, r1, c0, c0, 0 @ read the new csidr
> >> +#ifdef CONFIG_PREEMPT
> >> + restore_irqs r9
> >> +#endif
> > I'd suggest using restore_irqs_notrace instead. The IRQ-off period is
> > so small that there is no point tracing it.
>
> Thanks. I'll make sure to do that before uploading to the patch tracker.
Might be worth flagging this for the stable kernels as well
(CC: stable at kernel.org).
Nicolas
More information about the linux-arm-kernel
mailing list