cpu_relax in busy loops question
Daniel Lezcano
daniel.lezcano at linaro.org
Wed Feb 1 06:34:29 EST 2012
Hi Linus,
While looking at the drivers/mfd/db8500-prcmu.c file I noticed:
595 /* Grab the HW semaphore. */
596 while ((readl(PRCM_SEM) & PRCM_SEM_PRCM_SEM) != 0)
597 cpu_relax();
I was wondering why is cpu_relax needed here as readl does a memory
barrier ? I thought the cpu_relax function was related to the x86 to
consume less power with an optimization of the "rep nop" loops or/and do
a memory barrier.
Should a busy-loop be always with cpu_relax ?
Thanks
-- Daniel
--
<http://www.linaro.org/> Linaro.org │ Open source software for ARM SoCs
Follow Linaro: <http://www.facebook.com/pages/Linaro> Facebook |
<http://twitter.com/#!/linaroorg> Twitter |
<http://www.linaro.org/linaro-blog/> Blog
More information about the linux-arm-kernel
mailing list