[PATCH V1] arm: tegra: dma: not required to move requestor when stopping.
Olof Johansson
olof at lixom.net
Wed Feb 1 02:09:18 EST 2012
On Tue, Jan 31, 2012 at 04:32:48PM +0530, Laxman Dewangan wrote:
> On Wednesday 25 January 2012 02:27 AM, Stephen Warren wrote:
> >Laxman Dewangan wrote at Tuesday, January 24, 2012 1:11 AM:
> >>It is not require to move the requestor of dma to INVALID
> >>option before stopping dma.
> >>
> >>Signed-off-by: Laxman Dewangan<ldewangan at nvidia.com>
> >Acked-by: Stephen Warren<swarren at nvidia.com>
> >Tested-by: Stephen Warren<swarren at nvidia.com>
> >
> >I know that Laxman has checked with the HW engineers, and they see no
> >reason to do this. I was originally worried about hung FIFOs preventing
> >an in-progress DMA from completely without the removed code, but according
> >to HW, that isn't a concern.
> >
> Olaf,
> Can it be applied if it is OK to you?
Yep, applied.
-Olof
More information about the linux-arm-kernel
mailing list