[PATCH 4/7] regulator: anatop-regulator: convert to use imx-syscon to access anatop register

Richard Zhao richard.zhao at freescale.com
Thu Aug 23 02:12:03 EDT 2012


On Wed, Aug 22, 2012 at 11:21:03PM -0600, Stephen Warren wrote:
> On 08/22/2012 01:18 AM, Dong Aisheng wrote:
> > Signed-off-by: Dong Aisheng <dong.aisheng at linaro.org>
> 
> > diff --git a/drivers/regulator/anatop-regulator.c b/drivers/regulator/anatop-regulator.c
> 
> > @@ -109,7 +110,11 @@ static int __devinit anatop_regulator_probe(struct platform_device *pdev)
> >  	rdesc->ops = &anatop_rops;
> >  	rdesc->type = REGULATOR_VOLTAGE;
> >  	rdesc->owner = THIS_MODULE;
> > -	sreg->mfd = anatopmfd;
> > +
> > +	sreg->anatop = of_parse_phandle(np, "fsl,anatop", 0);
> > +	if (!sreg->anatop)
> > +		return -ENODEV;
> 
> In fact, that imx_syscon_lookup function I proposed could even do the
> of_parse_phandle() internally, so perhaps:
> 
> foo->syscon_dev = imx_syscon_lookup(np, "fsl,anatop", 0);
> if (IS_ERR(foo->syscon_dev))
>     return PTR_ERR(foo->syscon_dev);
> 
> with imx_syscon_lookup() internally knowing when to return EPROBE_DEFER
> rather than any other permanent error code (e.g. for missing property,
> bad phandle, etc.)
In some case that we access register in machine code, we don't have any
phandler. The node is got by find compatible or by path.

Thanks
Richard 




More information about the linux-arm-kernel mailing list