[PATCH 4/9] ARM: pmu: remove arm_pmu_type enumeration
Will Deacon
will.deacon at arm.com
Mon Aug 20 05:01:38 EDT 2012
On Fri, Aug 17, 2012 at 03:08:51PM +0100, Jon Hunter wrote:
> Hi Will, Tony,
Hi Jon [adding Arnd],
> On 08/10/2012 12:36 PM, Will Deacon wrote:
> > diff --git a/arch/arm/mach-omap2/devices.c b/arch/arm/mach-omap2/devices.c
> > index c00c689..02b9478 100644
> > --- a/arch/arm/mach-omap2/devices.c
> > +++ b/arch/arm/mach-omap2/devices.c
> > @@ -23,7 +23,6 @@
> > #include <mach/irqs.h>
> > #include <asm/mach-types.h>
> > #include <asm/mach/map.h>
> > -#include <asm/pmu.h>
> >
> > #include "iomap.h"
> > #include <plat/board.h>
> > @@ -448,7 +447,7 @@ static struct resource omap3_pmu_resource = {
> >
> > static struct platform_device omap_pmu_device = {
> > .name = "arm-pmu",
> > - .id = ARM_PMU_DEVICE_CPU,
> > + .id = -1,
> > .num_resources = 1,
> > };
>
> I know that I have already ack-ed the change and it is fine with me,
> however, I see a potential merge conflict here with my patch [1]
> (assuming that these all go into v3.7) where I am moving the above
> structure.
Are your patches queued anywhere other than your tree? If not, then I could
ask Arnd to pull the perf changes into their own branch in arm-soc and you
could rebase onto that.
> For testing I have rebased my series on top of this series and it is
> working well so far on OMAP4460.
Great, thanks. Can I add your tested-by to the patches please?
Will
More information about the linux-arm-kernel
mailing list