[PATCH v5 0/8] ARM: OMAP2+: PM: introduce the power domains functional states
paul at pwsan.com
Wed Aug 15 20:48:13 EDT 2012
On Wed, 15 Aug 2012, Shilimkar, Santosh wrote:
> On Wed, Aug 15, 2012 at 3:32 PM, Jean Pihet <jean.pihet at newoldbits.com> wrote:
> I didn't find any mention here about why are we going in this path and not
> in the direction proposed in another RFC 
> I have already given my comments against the introduction of another PD
> layer which can be avoided easily as demonstrated by the RFC. The comments
> are still applicable for this series too.
> We really need to reduce OMAP specific framework overhead and
> move towards more generic PM frameworks. For me, this series is
> a step back-ward from that direction. Am really sorry for being critical
> again but I remain unconvinced about this series and the problem it
> is trying to solve.
> May be you have valid reasons not to follow the approach in  and in
> that case, it will be good to clarify that so that some of us get
> to know your rationale.
I've asked Jean to handle the work of evaluating and/or integrating any
feedback from you and Rajendra into this series. Jean, has this latest
series fully considered those issues? Or are there still some areas of
misalignment / lack of clarity?
Anyway. If there's a problem with this process, it sounds like you,
Rajendra, Jean, Benoît and I should schedule some time to talk over the
same issues that you discussed with me on the phone. Perhaps next week?
More information about the linux-arm-kernel