[PATCH v2 21/31] arm64: 32-bit (compat) applications support
Arnd Bergmann
arnd at arndb.de
Wed Aug 15 10:34:04 EDT 2012
On Tuesday 14 August 2012, Catalin Marinas wrote:
> +#ifdef CONFIG_AARCH32_EMULATION
> +#include <linux/compat.h>
> +
> +#define AARCH32_KERN_SIGRET_CODE_OFFSET 0x500
> +
> +extern const compat_ulong_t aarch32_sigret_code[6];
> +
> +int compat_setup_frame(int usig, struct k_sigaction *ka, sigset_t *set,
> + struct pt_regs *regs);
> +int compat_setup_rt_frame(int usig, struct k_sigaction *ka, siginfo_t *info,
> + sigset_t *set, struct pt_regs *regs);
> +
> +void compat_setup_restart_syscall(struct pt_regs *regs);
> +#else
> +
> +static inline int compat_setup_frame(int usid, struct k_sigaction *ka,
> + sigset_t *set, struct pt_regs *regs)
> +{
> + BUG();
> +}
What good is the run-time BUG() here? Nothing should be calling these
when CONFIG_COMPAT is disabled, so I think you should just remove
the #ifdef around the declarations, and the entire #else case.
> +asmlinkage int compat_sys_sched_rr_get_interval(compat_pid_t pid,
> + struct compat_timespec __user *interval)
> +{
> + struct timespec t;
> + int ret;
> + mm_segment_t old_fs = get_fs();
> +
> + set_fs(KERNEL_DS);
> + ret = sys_sched_rr_get_interval(pid, (struct timespec __user *)&t);
> + set_fs(old_fs);
> + if (put_compat_timespec(&t, interval))
> + return -EFAULT;
> + return ret;
> +}
> +
> +asmlinkage int compat_sys_sendfile(int out_fd, int in_fd,
> + compat_off_t __user *offset, s32 count)
> +{
> + mm_segment_t old_fs = get_fs();
> + int ret;
> + off_t of;
> +
> + if (offset && get_user(of, offset))
> + return -EFAULT;
> +
> + set_fs(KERNEL_DS);
> + ret = sys_sendfile(out_fd, in_fd, offset ? (off_t __user *)&of : NULL,
> + count);
> + set_fs(old_fs);
> +
> + if (offset && put_user(of, offset))
> + return -EFAULT;
> + return ret;
> +}
I guess it's time to move these two into common code. They look like they should
be shared across most architectures that have compat support.
> +asmlinkage int compat_sys_personality(compat_ulong_t personality)
> +{
> + int ret;
> +
> + if (personality(current->personality) == PER_LINUX32 &&
> + personality == PER_LINUX)
> + personality = PER_LINUX32;
> + ret = sys_personality(personality);
> + if (ret == PER_LINUX32)
> + ret = PER_LINUX;
> + return ret;
> +}
Where did you get this from?
You should not need compat_sys_personality, just call the native function.
Arnd
More information about the linux-arm-kernel
mailing list