[PATCH 1/9] ARM: PMU: Add runtime PM Support
Ming Lei
ming.lei at canonical.com
Sat Aug 11 11:09:51 EDT 2012
On Sat, Aug 11, 2012 at 1:36 AM, Will Deacon <will.deacon at arm.com> wrote:
> From: Jon Hunter <jon-hunter at ti.com>
>
> Add runtime PM support to the ARM PMU driver so that devices such as OMAP
> supporting dynamic PM can use the platform->runtime_* hooks to initialise
> hardware at runtime. Without having these runtime PM hooks in place any
> configuration of the PMU hardware would be lost when low power states are
> entered and hence would prevent PMU from working.
>
> This change also replaces the PMU platform functions enable_irq and disable_irq
> added by Ming Lei with runtime_resume and runtime_suspend funtions. Ming had
> added the enable_irq and disable_irq functions as a method to configure the
> cross trigger interface on OMAP4 for routing the PMU interrupts. By adding
> runtime PM support, we can move the code called by enable_irq and disable_irq
> into the runtime PM callbacks runtime_resume and runtime_suspend.
>
> Cc: Ming Lei <ming.lei at canonical.com>
> Cc: Benoit Cousson <b-cousson at ti.com>
> Cc: Paul Walmsley <paul at pwsan.com>
> Cc: Kevin Hilman <khilman at ti.com>
> Signed-off-by: Jon Hunter <jon-hunter at ti.com>
> Signed-off-by: Will Deacon <will.deacon at arm.com>
> ---
> arch/arm/include/asm/pmu.h | 20 ++++++++++++--------
> arch/arm/kernel/perf_event.c | 41 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++--------
> 2 files changed, 45 insertions(+), 16 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/arch/arm/include/asm/pmu.h b/arch/arm/include/asm/pmu.h
> index 4432305..40d7dff 100644
> --- a/arch/arm/include/asm/pmu.h
> +++ b/arch/arm/include/asm/pmu.h
> @@ -31,18 +31,22 @@ enum arm_pmu_type {
> * interrupt and passed the address of the low level handler,
> * and can be used to implement any platform specific handling
> * before or after calling it.
> - * @enable_irq: an optional handler which will be called after
> - * request_irq and be used to handle some platform specific
> - * irq enablement
> - * @disable_irq: an optional handler which will be called before
> - * free_irq and be used to handle some platform specific
> - * irq disablement
> + * @runtime_resume: an optional handler which will be called by the
> + * runtime PM framework following a call to pm_runtime_get().
> + * Note that if pm_runtime_get() is called more than once in
> + * succession this handler will only be called once.
> + * @runtime_suspend: an optional handler which will be called by the
> + * runtime PM framework following a call to pm_runtime_put().
> + * Note that if pm_runtime_get() is called more than once in
> + * succession this handler will only be called following the
> + * final call to pm_runtime_put() that actually disables the
> + * hardware.
> */
> struct arm_pmu_platdata {
> irqreturn_t (*handle_irq)(int irq, void *dev,
> irq_handler_t pmu_handler);
> - void (*enable_irq)(int irq);
> - void (*disable_irq)(int irq);
> + int (*runtime_resume)(struct device *dev);
> + int (*runtime_suspend)(struct device *dev);
> };
>
> #ifdef CONFIG_CPU_HAS_PMU
> diff --git a/arch/arm/kernel/perf_event.c b/arch/arm/kernel/perf_event.c
> index ab243b8..c44647e 100644
> --- a/arch/arm/kernel/perf_event.c
> +++ b/arch/arm/kernel/perf_event.c
> @@ -20,6 +20,7 @@
> #include <linux/platform_device.h>
> #include <linux/spinlock.h>
> #include <linux/uaccess.h>
> +#include <linux/pm_runtime.h>
>
> #include <asm/cputype.h>
> #include <asm/irq.h>
> @@ -364,8 +365,6 @@ armpmu_release_hardware(struct arm_pmu *armpmu)
> {
> int i, irq, irqs;
> struct platform_device *pmu_device = armpmu->plat_device;
> - struct arm_pmu_platdata *plat =
> - dev_get_platdata(&pmu_device->dev);
>
> irqs = min(pmu_device->num_resources, num_possible_cpus());
>
> @@ -373,13 +372,11 @@ armpmu_release_hardware(struct arm_pmu *armpmu)
> if (!cpumask_test_and_clear_cpu(i, &armpmu->active_irqs))
> continue;
> irq = platform_get_irq(pmu_device, i);
> - if (irq >= 0) {
> - if (plat && plat->disable_irq)
> - plat->disable_irq(irq);
> + if (irq >= 0)
> free_irq(irq, armpmu);
> - }
> }
>
> + pm_runtime_put_sync(&pmu_device->dev);
One question, each pmu is just inside one cpu core and should be
suspended individually, but looks the above don't support it, do it?
> release_pmu(armpmu->type);
> }
>
> @@ -412,6 +409,8 @@ armpmu_reserve_hardware(struct arm_pmu *armpmu)
> return -ENODEV;
> }
>
> + pm_runtime_get_sync(&pmu_device->dev);
Similar with above.
Thanks,
--
Ming Lei
More information about the linux-arm-kernel
mailing list