[PATCH v4 0/5] usb: phy: samsung: Introducing usb phy driver for samsung SoCs
Felipe Balbi
balbi at ti.com
Fri Aug 10 03:06:24 EDT 2012
On Fri, Aug 10, 2012 at 12:40:26PM +0530, Praveen Paneri wrote:
> Changes from v3:
> Replaced susbsys_initcall()/module_exit() by module_platform_driver().
> Accordingly in the hsotg driver returned -EPROBE_DEFER until phy driver
> is registered
> Removed unnecessary devm_usb_put_phy() call from the hsotg driver remove.
>
> Changes from v2:
> Changed the driver filenames to samsung-usbphy
> Changed 's3c' to 'samsung' for platform device as well as platform data
> Moved platform data structure to a separate file
> Rectified coding style related errors
>
> Changes from v1:
> Rebased patches to latest usb-next branch
> Changed the name 'sec_usbphy' to 'samsung_usbphy'
>
> This patch set introduces a phy driver for samsung SoCs. It uses the existing
> transceiver infrastructure to provide phy control functions. Use of this driver
> can be extended for usb host phy as well. Over the period of time all the phy
> related code for most of the samsung SoCs can be integrated here.
> Removing the existing phy code from mach-s3c64xx. Same can be done for other SoCs
> when they start supporting this phy driver.
> This driver is tested with smdk6410 and Exynos4210(with DT).
>
> Praveen Paneri (5):
> usb: phy: samsung: Introducing usb phy driver for hsotg
> usb: s3c-hsotg: Adding phy driver support
> ARM: S3C64XX: Removing old phy setup code
> ARM: S3C64XX: Enabling samsung-usbphy driver
> ARM: Exynos4210: Enabling samsung-usbphy driver
just one idea. It looks like after introducing the PHY, you converted
all users to create the phy device. I wonder if you should have a
patch 6/6 which will remove pdata->init support from s3c_hsotg.c and
stick to using phy driver.
--
balbi
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: signature.asc
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 836 bytes
Desc: Digital signature
URL: <http://lists.infradead.org/pipermail/linux-arm-kernel/attachments/20120810/2ddf73c1/attachment.sig>
More information about the linux-arm-kernel
mailing list