[Xen-devel] [PATCH 01/24] arm: initial Xen support
Konrad Rzeszutek Wilk
konrad.wilk at oracle.com
Thu Aug 2 10:13:41 EDT 2012
On Thu, Aug 02, 2012 at 08:35:51AM +0100, Ian Campbell wrote:
> On Wed, 2012-08-01 at 19:27 +0100, Rob Herring wrote:
> > On 07/26/2012 10:33 AM, Stefano Stabellini wrote:
> > > - Basic hypervisor.h and interface.h definitions.
> > > - Skelethon enlighten.c, set xen_start_info to an empty struct.
> > > - Do not limit xen_initial_domain to PV guests.
> > >
> > > The new code only compiles when CONFIG_XEN is set, that is going to be
> > > added to arch/arm/Kconfig in a later patch.
> > >
> > > Signed-off-by: Stefano Stabellini <stefano.stabellini at eu.citrix.com>
> > > ---
> > > arch/arm/Makefile | 1 +
> > > arch/arm/include/asm/hypervisor.h | 6 +++
> > > arch/arm/include/asm/xen/hypervisor.h | 19 ++++++++++
> > > arch/arm/include/asm/xen/interface.h | 64 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
> >
> > These headers don't seem particularly ARM specific. Could they be moved
> > to asm-generic or include/linux?
>
> Or perhaps include/xen.
>
> A bunch of it also looks like x86 specific stuff which has crept in.
> e.g. PARAVIRT_LAZY_FOO and paravirt_get_lazy_mode() are arch/x86
> specific and shouldn't be called from common code (and aren't, AFAICT).
The could be moved out..
More information about the linux-arm-kernel
mailing list