[PATCH v3 2/2] at91: add Atmel ISI and ov2640 support on sam9m10/sam9g45 board.
Wu, Josh
Josh.wu at atmel.com
Mon Sep 26 06:57:25 EDT 2011
On Thu, 22 Sep 2011, Guennadi wrote:
> On Thu, 22 Sep 2011, Josh Wu wrote:
>> This patch
>> 1. add ISI_MCK parent setting code when add ISI device.
>> 2. add ov2640 support on board file.
>> 3. define isi_mck clock in sam9g45 chip file.
>>
>> Signed-off-by: Josh Wu <josh.wu at xxxxxxxxx>
>> ---
>> arch/arm/mach-at91/at91sam9g45.c | 3 +
>> arch/arm/mach-at91/at91sam9g45_devices.c | 105 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++-
>> arch/arm/mach-at91/board-sam9m10g45ek.c | 85 ++++++++++++++++++++++++-
>> arch/arm/mach-at91/include/mach/board.h | 3 +-
> Personally, I think, it would be better to separate this into two patches
> at least: one for at91 core and one for the specific board, but that's up
> to arch maintainers to decide.
> You also want to patch arch/arm/mach-at91/at91sam9263_devices.c, don't
> you?
As discussed in mail list, it will really break at91sam9263_devices.c's compilation.
So I will fix this in 9263_device.c, and merge this fix with mach-at91/include/mach/board.h change into one patch.
And other files as another patch.
>> 4 files changed, 193 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-)
>>
>> diff --git a/arch/arm/mach-at91/at91sam9g45.c b/arch/arm/mach-at91/at91sam9g45.c
>> index e04c5fb..5e23d6d 100644
>> --- a/arch/arm/mach-at91/at91sam9g45.c
>> +++ b/arch/arm/mach-at91/at91sam9g45.c
>> @@ -201,6 +201,7 @@ static struct clk *periph_clocks[] __initdata = {
>> // irq0
>> };
>>
>> +static struct clk pck1;
> Hm, it really doesn't need any initialisation, not even for the .type
> field? .type=0 doesn't seem to be valid.
This line is only a forward declaration. Since the real definition is behind the code we use it.
It defined in later lines:
static struct clk pck1 = {
.name = "pck1",
.pmc_mask = AT91_PMC_PCK1,
.type = CLK_TYPE_PROGRAMMABLE,
.id = 1,
};
>> static struct clk_lookup periph_clocks_lookups[] = {
>> /* One additional fake clock for ohci */
>> CLKDEV_CON_ID("ohci_clk", &uhphs_clk),
>> @@ -215,6 +216,8 @@ static struct clk_lookup periph_clocks_lookups[] = {
>> CLKDEV_CON_DEV_ID("t0_clk", "atmel_tcb.1", &tcb0_clk),
>> CLKDEV_CON_DEV_ID("pclk", "ssc.0", &ssc0_clk),
>> CLKDEV_CON_DEV_ID("pclk", "ssc.1", &ssc1_clk),
>> + /* ISI_MCK, which is provided by programmable clock(PCK1) */
>> + CLKDEV_CON_DEV_ID("isi_mck", "atmel_isi.0", &pck1),
>> };
>>
>> static struct clk_lookup usart_clocks_lookups[] = {
>> diff --git a/arch/arm/mach-at91/at91sam9g45_devices.c b/arch/arm/mach-at91/at91sam9g45_devices.c
>> index 600bffb..82eeac8 100644
>> --- a/arch/arm/mach-at91/at91sam9g45_devices.c
>> +++ b/arch/arm/mach-at91/at91sam9g45_devices.c
>> @@ -16,7 +16,7 @@
>> #include <linux/platform_device.h>
>> #include <linux/i2c-gpio.h>
>> #include <linux/atmel-mci.h>
>> -
>> +#include <linux/clk.h>
>> #include <linux/fb.h>
>> #include <video/atmel_lcdc.h>
>>
>> @@ -28,6 +28,8 @@
>> #include <mach/at_hdmac.h>
>> #include <mach/atmel-mci.h>
>>
>> +#include <media/atmel-isi.h>
>> +
>> #include "generic.h"
>>
>>
>> @@ -863,6 +865,107 @@ void __init at91_add_device_ac97(struct ac97c_platform_data *data)
>> void __init at91_add_device_ac97(struct ac97c_platform_data *data) {}
>> #endif
>>
>> +/* --------------------------------------------------------------------
>> + * Image Sensor Interface
>> + * -------------------------------------------------------------------- */
>> +#if defined(CONFIG_VIDEO_ATMEL_ISI) || defined(CONFIG_VIDEO_ATMEL_ISI_MODULE)
>> +static u64 isi_dmamask = DMA_BIT_MASK(32);
>> +static struct isi_platform_data isi_data;
>> +
>> +struct resource isi_resources[] = {
>> + [0] = {
>> + .start = AT91SAM9G45_BASE_ISI,
>> + .end = AT91SAM9G45_BASE_ISI + SZ_16K - 1,
>> + .flags = IORESOURCE_MEM,
>> + },
>> + [1] = {
>> + .start = AT91SAM9G45_ID_ISI,
>> + .end = AT91SAM9G45_ID_ISI,
>> + .flags = IORESOURCE_IRQ,
>> + },
>> +};
>> +
>> +static struct platform_device at91sam9g45_isi_device = {
>> + .name = "atmel_isi",
>> + .id = 0,
>> + .dev = {
>> + .dma_mask = &isi_dmamask,
>> + .coherent_dma_mask = DMA_BIT_MASK(32),
>> + .platform_data = &isi_data,
>> + },
>> + .resource = isi_resources,
>> + .num_resources = ARRAY_SIZE(isi_resources),
>> +};
>> +
>> +static int __init isi_set_clk_parent(void)
>> +{
>> + struct clk *pck1;
>> + struct clk *plla;
>> + int ret;
>> +
>> + /* ISI_MCK is supplied by PCK1 - set parent for it. */
>> + pck1 = clk_get(NULL, "pck1");
>> + if (IS_ERR(pck1)) {
>> + printk(KERN_ERR "Failed to get PCK1\n");
>> + ret = PTR_ERR(pck1);
>> + goto err;
>> + }
>> +
>> + plla = clk_get(NULL, "plla");
>> + if (IS_ERR(plla)) {
>> + printk(KERN_ERR "Failed to get PLLA\n");
>> + ret = PTR_ERR(plla);
>> + goto err_pck1;
>> + }
>> + ret = clk_set_parent(pck1, plla);
>> + clk_put(plla);
>> + if (ret != 0) {
>> + printk(KERN_ERR "Failed to set PCK1 parent\n");
>> + goto err_pck1;
>> + }
>> + return ret;
>> +
>> +err_pck1:
>> + clk_put(pck1);
>> +err:
>> + return ret;
>> +}
>> +
>> +void __init at91_add_device_isi(struct isi_platform_data * data)
>> +{
>> + if (!data)
>> + return;
>> + isi_data = *data;
>> +
>> + at91_set_A_periph(AT91_PIN_PB20, 0); /* ISI_D0 */
>> + at91_set_A_periph(AT91_PIN_PB21, 0); /* ISI_D1 */
>> + at91_set_A_periph(AT91_PIN_PB22, 0); /* ISI_D2 */
>> + at91_set_A_periph(AT91_PIN_PB23, 0); /* ISI_D3 */
>> + at91_set_A_periph(AT91_PIN_PB24, 0); /* ISI_D4 */
>> + at91_set_A_periph(AT91_PIN_PB25, 0); /* ISI_D5 */
>> + at91_set_A_periph(AT91_PIN_PB26, 0); /* ISI_D6 */
>> + at91_set_A_periph(AT91_PIN_PB27, 0); /* ISI_D7 */
>> + at91_set_A_periph(AT91_PIN_PB28, 0); /* ISI_PCK */
>> + at91_set_A_periph(AT91_PIN_PB30, 0); /* ISI_HSYNC */
>> + at91_set_A_periph(AT91_PIN_PB29, 0); /* ISI_VSYNC */
>> + at91_set_B_periph(AT91_PIN_PB31, 0); /* ISI_MCK (PCK1) */
>> + at91_set_B_periph(AT91_PIN_PB8, 0); /* ISI_PD8 */
>> + at91_set_B_periph(AT91_PIN_PB9, 0); /* ISI_PD9 */
>> + at91_set_B_periph(AT91_PIN_PB10, 0); /* ISI_PD10 */
>> + at91_set_B_periph(AT91_PIN_PB11, 0); /* ISI_PD11 */
>> +
>> + platform_device_register(&at91sam9g45_isi_device);
>> +
>> + if (isi_set_clk_parent())
>> + printk(KERN_ERR "Fail to set parent for ISI_MCK.\n");
>> +
>> + return;
>> +}
>> +#else
>> +static int __init isi_set_clk_parent(void) { }
>> +void __init at91_add_device_isi(struct isi_platform_data * data) { }
>> +#endif
>> +
>>
>> /* --------------------------------------------------------------------
>> * LCD Controller
>> diff --git a/arch/arm/mach-at91/board-sam9m10g45ek.c b/arch/arm/mach-at91/board-sam9m10g45ek.c
>> index ad234cc..d5293fb 100644
>> --- a/arch/arm/mach-at91/board-sam9m10g45ek.c
>> +++ b/arch/arm/mach-at91/board-sam9m10g45ek.c
>> @@ -23,11 +23,13 @@
>> #include <linux/gpio_keys.h>
>> #include <linux/input.h>
>> #include <linux/leds.h>
>> -#include <linux/clk.h>
>> #include <linux/atmel-mci.h>
>> +#include <linux/delay.h>
>>
>> #include <mach/hardware.h>
>> #include <video/atmel_lcdc.h>
>> +#include <media/soc_camera.h>
>> +#include <media/atmel-isi.h>
>>
>> #include <asm/setup.h>
>> #include <asm/mach-types.h>
>> @@ -185,6 +187,83 @@ static void __init ek_add_device_nand(void)
>> at91_add_device_nand(&ek_nand_data);
>> }
>>
>> +/*
>> + * ISI
>> + */
>> +#if defined(CONFIG_VIDEO_ATMEL_ISI) || defined(CONFIG_VIDEO_ATMEL_ISI_MODULE)
>> +static struct isi_platform_data __initdata isi_data = {
>> + .frate = ISI_CFG1_FRATE_CAPTURE_ALL,
>> + .has_emb_sync = 0,
>> + .emb_crc_sync = 0,
>> + .hsync_act_low = 0,
>> + .vsync_act_low = 0,
>> + .pclk_act_falling = 0,
> You don't need all the "= 0" assignments above - all uninitialised fields
> will be = 0. Also, if you have started aligning assignments, as in .frate
> and .has_emb_sync, would be better to align all of them.
Sure, I will align those lines.
But I think this "= 0" will make code more readable. It is better not to ignore it. For example, ".has_emb_sync = 0" means we are NOT "has embedded sync".
>> + /* to use codec and preview path simultaneously */
>> + .isi_full_mode = 1,
>> + .data_width_flags = ISI_DATAWIDTH_8 | ISI_DATAWIDTH_10,
>> + /* ISI_MCK is provided by PCK1 */
>> + .isi_mck_hz = 25000000,
>> +};
>> +
>> +#else
>> +static struct isi_platform_data __initdata isi_data;
> Hmm, that doesn't help a lot, does it? Either do not allocate isi_data if
> ISI is not selected in .config, or just remove the "#if" completely.
I prefer to remove the "#if" completely.
>> +#endif
>> +
>> +/*
>> + * soc-camera OV2640
>> + */
>> +#if defined(CONFIG_SOC_CAMERA_OV2640)
>... || defined(CONFIG_SOC_CAMERA_OV2640_MODULE)
sorry, I missed this.
>> +static unsigned long isi_camera_query_bus_param(struct soc_camera_link *link)
>> +{
>> + /* ISI board for ek using default 8-bits connection */
>> + return SOCAM_DATAWIDTH_8;
>> +}
>> +
>> +static int i2c_camera_power(struct device *dev, int on)
>> +{
>> + /* enable or disable the camera */
>> + pr_debug("%s: %s the camera\n", __func__, on ? "ENABLE" : "DISABLE");
>> + at91_set_gpio_output(AT91_PIN_PD13, on ? 0 : 1);
> maybe just
>
> at91_set_gpio_output(AT91_PIN_PD13, !on);
I'll change it. It is simpler.
>> +
>> + if (!on)
>> + goto out;
>> +
>> + /* If enabled, give a reset impulse */
>> + at91_set_gpio_output(AT91_PIN_PD12, 0);
>> + msleep(20);
>> + at91_set_gpio_output(AT91_PIN_PD12, 1);
>> + msleep(100);
>> +
>> +out:
>> + return 0;
>> +}
>> +
>> +static struct i2c_board_info i2c_camera = {
>> + I2C_BOARD_INFO("ov2640", 0x30),
>> +};
>> +
>> +static struct soc_camera_link iclink_ov2640 = {
>> + .bus_id = 0,
>> + .board_info = &i2c_camera,
>> + .i2c_adapter_id = 0,
>> + .power = i2c_camera_power,
>> + .query_bus_param = isi_camera_query_bus_param,
> You could as well make this alignment look better.
Sure.
>> +};
>> +
>> +static struct platform_device isi_ov2640 = {
>> + .name = "soc-camera-pdrv",
>> + .id = 0,
>> + .dev = {
>> + .platform_data = &iclink_ov2640,
>> + },
>> +};
>> +
>> +static struct platform_device *devices[] __initdata = {
>> + &isi_ov2640,
>> +};
>> +#else
>> +static struct platform_device *devices[] __initdata = {};
>> +#endif
>>
>> /*
>> * LCD Controller
>> @@ -400,6 +479,10 @@ static void __init ek_board_init(void)
>> ek_add_device_nand();
>> /* I2C */
>> at91_add_device_i2c(0, NULL, 0);
>> + /* ISI */
>> + platform_add_devices(devices, ARRAY_SIZE(devices));
> "devices" is a generic name, but you make it depend on
> CONFIG_SOC_CAMERA_OV2640. Why don't you do
>
> static struct platform_device *devices[] __initdata = {
> #if defined(CONFIG_SOC_CAMERA_OV2640) || defined(CONFIG_SOC_CAMERA_OV2640_MODULE)
> &isi_ov2640,
> #endif
> };
>
> and move
>
> + platform_add_devices(devices, ARRAY_SIZE(devices));
>
> out of the /* ISI */ section to a more generic location?
Yes, make sense to me.
>> + at91_add_device_isi(&isi_data);
>> +
>> /* LCD Controller */
>> at91_add_device_lcdc(&ek_lcdc_data);
>> /* Touch Screen */
>> diff --git a/arch/arm/mach-at91/include/mach/board.h b/arch/arm/mach-at91/include/mach/board.h
>> index ed544a0..276d63a 100644
>> --- a/arch/arm/mach-at91/include/mach/board.h
>> +++ b/arch/arm/mach-at91/include/mach/board.h
>> @@ -183,7 +183,8 @@ extern void __init at91_add_device_lcdc(struct atmel_lcdfb_info *data);
>> extern void __init at91_add_device_ac97(struct ac97c_platform_data *data);
>>
>> /* ISI */
>> -extern void __init at91_add_device_isi(void);
>> +struct isi_platform_data;
>> +extern void __init at91_add_device_isi(struct isi_platform_data *data);
>>
>> /* Touchscreen Controller */
>> struct at91_tsadcc_data {
>> --
>> 1.6.3.3
> Thanks
> Guennadi
Best Regards,
Josh Wu
More information about the linux-arm-kernel
mailing list