[PATCH 0/4] ARM: EXYNOS4: Support generic Power domain framework for EXYNOS4210
Sylwester Nawrocki
snjw23 at gmail.com
Sat Sep 24 13:27:53 EDT 2011
On 08/13/2011 11:24 PM, Rafael J. Wysocki wrote:
> On Thursday, August 11, 2011, Chanwoo Choi wrote:
>> The following patch set use the generic Power domain Framework instead of
>> power domain code depend of Samsung SoC.
>>
>> Chanwoo Choi (4):
>> ARM: EXYNOS4: Support for generic I/O power domains on EXYNOS4210
>> ARM: EXYNOS4: Support for generic Clock manipulation PM callbacks
>> ARM: EXYNOS4: Delete the power-domain code depend on Samsung SoC
>> ARM: EXYNOS4: Add power domain to use generic Power domain Framework
>>
>> arch/arm/mach-exynos4/Kconfig | 10 +-
>> arch/arm/mach-exynos4/Makefile | 4 +-
>> arch/arm/mach-exynos4/dev-pd.c | 139 --------------
>> arch/arm/mach-exynos4/include/mach/pm-exynos4210.h | 52 ++++++
>> arch/arm/mach-exynos4/include/mach/regs-clock.h | 8 +
>> arch/arm/mach-exynos4/mach-nuri.c | 21 ++-
>> arch/arm/mach-exynos4/mach-smdkc210.c | 26 ++-
>> arch/arm/mach-exynos4/mach-smdkv310.c | 23 ++-
>> arch/arm/mach-exynos4/mach-universal_c210.c | 21 ++-
>> arch/arm/mach-exynos4/pm-exynos4210.c | 189 ++++++++++++++++++++
>> arch/arm/mach-exynos4/pm-runtime.c | 56 ++++++
>> arch/arm/plat-samsung/Kconfig | 8 -
>> arch/arm/plat-samsung/Makefile | 4 -
>> arch/arm/plat-samsung/include/plat/pd.h | 30 ---
>> arch/arm/plat-samsung/pd.c | 95 ----------
>> 15 files changed, 377 insertions(+), 309 deletions(-)
>> delete mode 100644 arch/arm/mach-exynos4/dev-pd.c
>> create mode 100644 arch/arm/mach-exynos4/include/mach/pm-exynos4210.h
>> create mode 100644 arch/arm/mach-exynos4/pm-exynos4210.c
>> create mode 100644 arch/arm/mach-exynos4/pm-runtime.c
>> delete mode 100644 arch/arm/plat-samsung/include/plat/pd.h
>> delete mode 100644 arch/arm/plat-samsung/pd.c
>
> The patchset looks good to me, but please note that some code it
> is based on will most likely change in 3.2 due to this patchset:
>
> https://lkml.org/lkml/2011/8/8/420
Are we going to have this patch set in 3.2 ? Does it need more work
or is it already merged in someone's -next repository ?
--
Thanks,
Sylwester
More information about the linux-arm-kernel
mailing list