[GIT PULL] ux500-core for 3.2
linus.walleij at linaro.org
Thu Sep 22 07:23:51 EDT 2011
On Tue, Sep 20, 2011 at 10:48 PM, Arnd Bergmann <arnd at arndb.de> wrote:
> On Tuesday 20 September 2011, Linus Walleij wrote:
>> to the ARM SoC tree (ux500 branch or however you prefer to handle it)?
>> They have all been reviewed on the ARM list recently and are mostly
>> minor fixes and Lee Jones nice cleanup patch.
> I would really like to see this split into logical branches, even
> if there are just a few patches for each of them.
No problem. So the preferred scheme is to have three topics
for a SoC: fixes, cleanup and "new stuff" or something like that?
> It's also not clear if the two bug fix patches should be applied
> to 3.1 and -stable as well as 3.2. My feeling is that they should.
Depends. For Srinidhi's
"mach-ux500: enable fix for ARM errata 754322"
"mach-ux500: unlock I&D l2x0 caches before init"
it's a performance regression, nothing like a crash or so.
(I guess you're referring to these two?)
> If you want bug fixes to be backported, please add a 'Cc: stable at kernel.org'
> line after your Signed-off-by. If not, add an explanation to the
> pull request why they are not relevant for backporting.
> Please submit the two bug fixes again, rebased to an -rc release.
Since it's just two patches I guess you can just pick these
two in plaintext? But I can make a pull request if you prefer...
More information about the linux-arm-kernel