[PATCH REPOST 1/2] arm/dt: Tegra: Update SDHCI nodes to match bindings
Chris Ball
cjb at laptop.org
Tue Sep 20 14:07:15 EDT 2011
Hi,
On Tue, Sep 20 2011, Stephen Warren wrote:
> Arnd Bergmann wrote at Tuesday, September 20, 2011 11:43 AM:
>> On Tuesday 20 September 2011, Stephen Warren wrote:
>> > The bindings were recently updated to have separate properties for each
>> > type of GPIO. Update the Device Tree source to match that.
>> >
>> > Signed-off-by: Stephen Warren <swarren at nvidia.com>
>> > Acked-by: Olof Johansson <olof at lixom.net>
>> > ---
>> > I'd previously sent these to Grant assuming they'd go in his dt/next branch,
>> > but perhaps these should go in through Arnd's arm-soc next/dt branch?
>> >
>>
>> Which tree has the update that changed the bindings? I think it should
>> go into the same one.
>>
>> If it's already upstream, I can take it into the fixes branch.
>
> Chris applied them to the mmc-next tree:
>
> git://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/cjb/mmc.git
>
> which appears to be temporarily at:
>
> git://dev.laptop.org/users/cjb/mmc
Sending these via Arnd's next/dt sounds good to me. I know we'd usually
take changes that require an atomic update through the same tree, but
Stephen said in https://lkml.org/lkml/2011/8/30/352 :
I don't think there's actually any need for that; initializing
Tegra's SDHCI from device-tree has never worked in mainline to date;
it relies on patch 1 being there. And if patch 2 was there without
patch 3, the worst that will happen is some port runs in 4-bit mode
instead of 8-bit, which evidently works fine since I didn't even
notice 8-bit support was missing...
Thanks,
- Chris.
--
Chris Ball <cjb at laptop.org> <http://printf.net/>
One Laptop Per Child
More information about the linux-arm-kernel
mailing list