[PATCH 02/25] OMAP4: Redefine mandatory barriers for OMAP to include interconnect barriers.

Kevin Hilman khilman at ti.com
Thu Sep 15 13:17:31 EDT 2011


Santosh <santosh.shilimkar at ti.com> writes:

> On Wednesday 14 September 2011 01:57 AM, Tony Lindgren wrote:
>> * Santosh Shilimkar<santosh.shilimkar at ti.com>  [110904 06:22]:
>>> On OMAP4 SOC intecronnects has many write buffers in the async bridges
>>> and they can be drained only with stongly ordered accesses.
>>
>> This is not correct, strongly ordered access does not guarantee
>> anything here. If it fixes issues, it's because it makes the writes
>> to reach the device faster. Strongly ordered does not affect anything
>> outside ARM, so the bus access won't change.
>>
> What I said is the aync bridges WB and what is said is correct
> from MPU accesses point of view.
>
> It's not about faster or slower. With device memory the, writes
> can get stuck into write buffers where as with SO, the write buffers
> will be bypassed.
>
> The behaviours is limited to the MPU side async bridge boundary which
> is the problem. The statement is not for l3 and l4 interconnect which
> probably you mean.
>
> There is always a hardware signal to communicate CPU at async bridges
> to ensure that data is not stuck in these bridges before CPU
> clock/voltage is cut. Unfortunately we have a BUG on OMAP44XX devices
> and the dual channel makes it even worst since both pipes have the
> same BUG. So what we are doing is issuing SO write/read accesses
> on these pipes so that there is nothing stuck there before MPU
> hits low power states and also avoids any race conditions when
> both channels are used together by some initiators. The behaviour
> is validated at RTL level and there is no ambiguity about it.
>
> May be you have mistaken the L3 and L4 as the interconnect levels
> in this case.

Sounds to me like the changelog needs to be a bit more verbose.

Remember, we're all probably going to forget the gory details of this in
a few months and want to be able to go back to the code w/changelog to
refresh our memories.

Thanks,

Kevin



More information about the linux-arm-kernel mailing list