[PATCH 2/6] arm/imx6q: add core definitions and low-level debug uart
Shawn Guo
shawn.guo at freescale.com
Mon Sep 12 04:43:52 EDT 2011
On Mon, Sep 12, 2011 at 09:41:47AM +0200, Uwe Kleine-König wrote:
> Hello Shawn,
>
> On Mon, Sep 12, 2011 at 10:30:01AM +0800, Shawn Guo wrote:
> > On Wed, Sep 07, 2011 at 02:36:35PM +0200, Uwe Kleine-König wrote:
> > > On Wed, Sep 07, 2011 at 07:00:02PM +0800, Shawn Guo wrote:
> > > > On Tue, Sep 06, 2011 at 10:25:55PM +0200, Uwe Kleine-König wrote:
> > > > > On Tue, Sep 06, 2011 at 05:58:36PM +0800, Shawn Guo wrote:
> >
> > [...]
> >
> > > > > > diff --git a/arch/arm/plat-mxc/include/mach/mx6q.h b/arch/arm/plat-mxc/include/mach/mx6q.h
> > > > > > new file mode 100644
> > > > > > index 0000000..7432310
> > > > > > --- /dev/null
> > > > > > +++ b/arch/arm/plat-mxc/include/mach/mx6q.h
> > > > > > @@ -0,0 +1,29 @@
> > > > > > +/*
> > > > > > + * Copyright 2011 Freescale Semiconductor, Inc. All Rights Reserved.
> > > > > > + * Copyright 2011 Linaro Ltd.
> > > > > > + *
> > > > > > + * The code contained herein is licensed under the GNU General Public
> > > > > > + * License. You may obtain a copy of the GNU General Public License
> > > > > > + * Version 2 or later at the following locations:
> > > > > > + *
> > > > > > + * http://www.opensource.org/licenses/gpl-license.html
> > > > > > + * http://www.gnu.org/copyleft/gpl.html
> > > > > > + */
> > > > > > +
> > > > > > +#ifndef __MACH_MX6Q_H__
> > > > > > +#define __MACH_MX6Q_H__
> > > > > > +
> > > > > > +/* static mappings */
> > > > > > +#define IMX6Q_VA(x) (0xf4000000 + (x))
> > > > > > +
> > > > > > +#define MX6Q_SCU_BASE_ADDR 0x00a00000
> > > > > > +#define MX6Q_CCM_BASE_ADDR 0x020c4000
> > > > > > +#define MX6Q_ANATOP_BASE_ADDR 0x020c8000
> > > > > > +#define MX6Q_UART4_BASE_ADDR 0x021f0000
> > > > > > +
> > > > > > +#define MX6Q_SCU_BASE_VADDR IMX6Q_VA(MX6Q_SCU_BASE_ADDR)
> > > > > > +#define MX6Q_CCM_BASE_VADDR IMX6Q_VA(MX6Q_CCM_BASE_ADDR)
> > > > > > +#define MX6Q_ANATOP_BASE_VADDR IMX6Q_VA(MX6Q_ANATOP_BASE_ADDR)
> > > > > > +#define MX6Q_UART4_BASE_VADDR IMX6Q_VA(MX6Q_UART4_BASE_ADDR)
> > > > > Depending on the sizes of these memory regions you can use the existing
> > > > > IMX_IO_P2V here. The conditions are:
> > > > >
> > > > > SCU_SIZE <= 0x200000
> > > Actually this should be 0x100000 as this is the size that is mapped in a
> > > continous chunk.
> > >
> > > > > CCM_SIZE <= 0x4000
> > > > > ANATOP_SIZE <= 0x28000
> > > > > UART4 <= 0x100000
> > > > >
> > > > This is exactly what I dislike about IMX_IO_P2V(). We have to verify
> > > > all these conditions manually. Looking at the static mapping below
> > > I did it semi-manual, I just put your constants for imx6q into my script
> > > (all with size=0x4000 for now) and it told me:
> > >
> > > ...
> > > * mx6q:
> > > * SCU 0x00a00000+0x004000 -> 0xf4000000+0x004000
> > > * CCM 0x020c4000+0x004000 -> 0xf42c4000+0x004000
> > > * ANATOP 0x020c8000+0x004000 -> 0xf42c8000+0x004000
> > > * UART4 0x021f0000+0x004000 -> 0xf42f0000+0x004000
> > > ...
> > >
> > > > (copied from arch/arm/plat-mxc/include/mach/hardware.h), do you think
> > > > it's really scalable and easy to maintain for the long run?
> > > At least it provides a way to verify the correctness of the mapping.
> > > Before I introduced the mapping function there was a conflict IIRC.
> > >
> > > > /*
> > > > * This is rather complicated for humans and ugly to verify, but for a machine
> > > > * it's OK. Still more as it is usually only applied to constants. The upsides
> > > > * on using this approach are:
> > > > *
> > > > * - same mapping on all i.MX machines
> > > > * - works for assembler, too
> > > > * - no need to nurture #defines for virtual addresses
> > > > *
> > > > * The downside it, it's hard to verify (but I have a script for that).
> > > If you want I can provide you that script.
> > >
> > Yes, please. I would use IMX_IO_P2V() in the next post.
> I just found a bug in the conflict detection code, so I put it in a
> repository to prevent the broken script to enter the archives. You can
> find it on
>
> git://git.pengutronix.de/git/ukl/imx-iop2v.git
>
Thanks, Uwe.
> > [...]
> >
> > > > #define IMX_IO_P2V(x) ( \
> > > > 0xf4000000 + \
> > > > (((x) & 0x50000000) >> 6) + \
> > > > (((x) & 0x0b000000) >> 4) + \
> > > > (((x) & 0x000fffff)))
> > > >
> > > > > hmm, looking at patch 4 SCU_BASE is determined by a coprocessor
> > > > > instruction?!
> > > >
> > > > Ah, yes. The SCU physical base address can be retrieved from
> > > > coprocessor.
> > > Is there an advantage in autodetecting the base address?
> > >
> > Any disadvantage for doing so?
> It makes
>
> #define MX6Q_SCU_BASE_ADDR 0x00a00000
>
> superfluous.
The definition is actually not needed. I put it there as a
documentation telling SCU is statically mapped.
> And in case the real address is different it might make
>
> IMX_IO_P2V(real scu address) != scu_io_desc.virtual
>
This should never happen.
One thing I'm trying to do is to keep arch/arm/mach-imx/platsmp.c
not specific to imx6q. The auto-detecting helps to keep
MX6Q_SCU_BASE_ADDR away from the file, so that one day when we have
another imx smp soc, we can simply reuse the file.
Regards,
Shawn
> which makes the scriptable check for conflicts kind of useless and might
> come as a surprise.
>
More information about the linux-arm-kernel
mailing list