[PATCH 2/2] ARM: SAMSUNG: Fix mask for S3C64xx CPU IDs

[Kukjin Kim]

Mark Brown wrote:
> 
> The difference in CPU ID between S3C6400 and S3C6410 is a single bit and
> that bit wasn't included in the mask causing the S3C6410 to be misdetected
> as a S3C6400.
> 
> Signed-off-by: Mark Brown <broonie at opensource.wolfsonmicro.com>
> ---
>  arch/arm/plat-samsung/include/plat/cpu.h |    2 +-
>  1 files changed, 1 insertions(+), 1 deletions(-)
> 
> diff --git a/arch/arm/plat-samsung/include/plat/cpu.h b/arch/arm/plat-
> samsung/include/plat/cpu.h
> index aa1f69b..4d36130 100644
> --- a/arch/arm/plat-samsung/include/plat/cpu.h
> +++ b/arch/arm/plat-samsung/include/plat/cpu.h
> @@ -26,7 +26,7 @@ extern unsigned long samsung_cpu_id;
>  #define S3C6400_CPU_ID		0x36400000
>  #define S3C6410_CPU_ID		0x36410000
>  #define S3C64XX_CPU_ID		(S3C6400_CPU_ID &
> S3C6410_CPU_ID)
> -#define S3C64XX_CPU_MASK	0x1FF40000
> +#define S3C64XX_CPU_MASK	0x1FFF0000
> 
>  #define S5P6440_CPU_ID		0x56440000
>  #define S5P6450_CPU_ID		0x36450000
> --
> 1.7.5.4

Oops, I don't know how it has wrong value :(
I think, in this case, it's better 0xFFFFF000 rather than 0x1FFF0000.

If any problems, please let me know.

Will apply, thanks :)

Best regards,
Kgene.
--
Kukjin Kim <kgene.kim at samsung.com>, Senior Engineer,
SW Solution Development Team, Samsung Electronics Co., Ltd.