[PATCH 1/2] mmc: sdhci-s3c: add default controller configuration

Kukjin Kim kgene.kim at samsung.com
Mon Sep 5 01:16:00 EDT 2011


Thomas Abraham wrote:
> 
> The default controller configuration which was previously setup by
> platform helper functions is moved into the driver.
> 
> Cc: Ben Dooks <ben-linux at fluff.org>
> Signed-off-by: Thomas Abraham <thomas.abraham at linaro.org>
> ---
>  drivers/mmc/host/sdhci-s3c.c |   28 +++++++++++++++++-----------
>  1 files changed, 17 insertions(+), 11 deletions(-)
> 
> diff --git a/drivers/mmc/host/sdhci-s3c.c b/drivers/mmc/host/sdhci-s3c.c
> index 2bd7bf4..d891682 100644
> --- a/drivers/mmc/host/sdhci-s3c.c
> +++ b/drivers/mmc/host/sdhci-s3c.c
> @@ -203,17 +203,23 @@ static void sdhci_s3c_set_clock(struct sdhci_host
*host,
> unsigned int clock)
>  		writel(ctrl, host->ioaddr + S3C_SDHCI_CONTROL2);
>  	}
> 
> -	/* reconfigure the hardware for new clock rate */
> -
> -	{
> -		struct mmc_ios ios;
> -
> -		ios.clock = clock;
> -
> -		if (ourhost->pdata->cfg_card)
> -			(ourhost->pdata->cfg_card)(ourhost->pdev, host-
> >ioaddr,
> -						   &ios, NULL);
> -	}
> +	/* reprogram default hardware configuration */
> +	writel(S3C64XX_SDHCI_CONTROL4_DRIVE_9mA,
> +		host->ioaddr + S3C64XX_SDHCI_CONTROL4);

Since there are above codes on only S5PC100 and S5PV210, I'm not sure above
is needed on other Samsung SoCs.

I need to sort out checking.

> +
> +	ctrl = readl(host->ioaddr + S3C_SDHCI_CONTROL2);

+	ctrl &= S3C_SDHCI_CTRL2_SELBASECLK_MASK; ?

> +	ctrl |= (S3C64XX_SDHCI_CTRL2_ENSTAASYNCCLR |
> +		  S3C64XX_SDHCI_CTRL2_ENCMDCNFMSK |
> +		  S3C_SDHCI_CTRL2_ENFBCLKRX |
> +		  S3C_SDHCI_CTRL2_DFCNT_NONE |
> +		  S3C_SDHCI_CTRL2_ENCLKOUTHOLD);
> +	writel(ctrl, host->ioaddr + S3C_SDHCI_CONTROL2);
> +
> +	/* reconfigure the controller for new clock rate */
> +	ctrl = (S3C_SDHCI_CTRL3_FCSEL1 | S3C_SDHCI_CTRL3_FCSEL0);
> +	if (clock < 25 * 1000000)
> +		ctrl |= (S3C_SDHCI_CTRL3_FCSEL3 |
> S3C_SDHCI_CTRL3_FCSEL2);
> +	writel(ctrl, host->ioaddr + S3C_SDHCI_CONTROL3);
>  }
> 
>  /**
> --

Basically, it's good to move common codes and to remove that. But I'm not
sure we don't _really_ need to keep SoC specific control function such as
cfg_card().

Thanks.

Best regards,
Kgene.
--
Kukjin Kim <kgene.kim at samsung.com>, Senior Engineer,
SW Solution Development Team, Samsung Electronics Co., Ltd.




More information about the linux-arm-kernel mailing list