[PATCH RESEND] davinci: dm646x: move vpif related code to driver core header from platform
nsekhar at ti.com
Wed Nov 30 05:47:04 EST 2011
On Fri, Nov 25, 2011 at 01:36:01, Mauro Carvalho Chehab wrote:
> Em 24-11-2011 16:22, Nori, Sekhar escreveu:
> > Hi Mauro,
> > On Thu, Nov 24, 2011 at 23:35:24, Mauro Carvalho Chehab wrote:
> >> Em 12-11-2011 13:06, Manjunath Hadli escreveu:
> >>> move vpif related code for capture and display drivers
> >>> from dm646x platform header file to vpif_types.h as these definitions
> >>> are related to driver code more than the platform or board.
> >>> Signed-off-by: Manjunath Hadli <manjunath.hadli at ti.com>
> >> Manju,
> >> Why are you re-sending a patch?
> >> My understanding is that you're maintaining the davinci patches, so it is
> >> up to you to put those patches on your tree and send me a pull request when
> >> they're done. So, please, don't pollute the ML re-sending emails that
> >> are for yourself to handle.
> > Since this particular patch touches arch/arm/mach-davinci
> > as well as drivers/media/video, the plan was to queue the
> > patch through ARM tree with your Ack. We did not get your
> > ack the last time around so it was resent.
> > Do let me know if your ack is not needed.
> > Thanks,
> > Sekhar
> >  http://firstname.lastname@example.org/msg21840.html
> Hmm.. I missed this email, but just re-sending it without request my ACK doesn't help
> much ;)
> If this ever happens again, next time the better is to forward me the patch again, on
> an email asking for my ack.
> With regards to the patch:
> Acked-by: Mauro Carvalho Chehab <mchehab at redhat.com>
Thanks Mauro. Queuing this for v3.3 submission.
Manju, while committing I changed the subject line to:
"ARM: davinci: vpif: move code to driver core header from platform"
to better match the current subject line conventions.
More information about the linux-arm-kernel