[RFC V1 7/8] ARM i.MX: prepare common clk support
Richard Zhao
richard.zhao at linaro.org
Wed Nov 30 01:18:16 EST 2011
On Tue, Nov 29, 2011 at 11:22:23AM -0800, Mike Turquette wrote:
> On Mon, Nov 28, 2011 at 7:09 PM, Richard Zhao <richard.zhao at linaro.org> wrote:
> > On Mon, Nov 28, 2011 at 06:36:33PM -0800, Mike Turquette wrote:
> >> On Wed, Nov 23, 2011 at 3:12 AM, Richard Zhao <richard.zhao at linaro.org> wrote:
> >> > +#define DEFINE_CLK_DIVIDER(_name, _parent, _flags, _reg, _shift, _width) \
> >> > + struct clk_divider _name = { \
> >> > + .clk = { \
> >> > + .name = #_name, \
> >> > + .ops = &clk_divider_ops, \
> >> > + .parent = _parent, \
> >> > + .flags = _flags, \
> >> > + }, \
> >> > + .reg = (_reg), \
> >> > + .shift = (_shift), \
> >> > + .width = (_width), \
> >> > + .lock = &imx_ccm_lock, \
> >> > + }
> >> > +
> >> > +#define DEFINE_CLK_MUX(_name, _reg, _shift, _width, _clks) \
> >> > + struct clk_mux _name = { \
> >> > + .clk = { \
> >> > + .name = #_name, \
> >> > + .ops = &clk_mux_ops, \
> >> > + }, \
> >> > + .reg = (_reg), \
> >> > + .shift = (_shift), \
> >> > + .width = (_width), \
> >> > + .clks = (_clks), \
> >> > + .num_clks = ARRAY_SIZE(_clks), \
> >> > + .lock = &imx_ccm_lock, \
> >> > + }
> >> > +
> >> > +#define DEFINE_CLK_FIXED(_name, _rate) \
> >> > + struct clk_hw_fixed _name = { \
> >> > + .clk = { \
> >> > + .name = #_name, \
> >> > + .ops = &clk_hw_fixed_ops, \
> >> > + }, \
> >> > + .fixed_rate = (_rate), \
> >> > + }
> >> > +
> >> > #endif /* CONFIG_GENERIC_CLK */
> >> > #endif /* __ASSEMBLY__ */
> >> > #endif /* __ASM_ARCH_MXC_CLOCK_H__ */
> >> > --
> >> > 1.7.5.4
> >> >
> >> >
> >> >
> >>
> >> Can you move these into clk.h/approriate header? Just add _lock to it
> >> and it'll work fine for your code.
> > Yes, I can add _lock and share the macros in common header. But I still
>
> On second thought you don't need to resubmit with these in clk.h; I'll
> absorb them into clk.h with my next common clk patchset.
Do you mean you also adopt divider and mux clock patch?
>
> > need a wraper for imx to eliminate _lock, right?
>
> No. Taking code from your patch 8/8:
>
> +static DEFINE_CLK_DIVIDER(perclk_pred1, &perclk_lp_apm.clk, 0,
> MXC_CCM_CBCDR, 6, 2);
> +static DEFINE_CLK_DIVIDER(perclk_pred2, &perclk_pred1.clk, 0,
> MXC_CCM_CBCDR, 3, 3);
> +static DEFINE_CLK_DIVIDER(perclk_podf, &perclk_pred2.clk,
> CLK_PARENT_SET_RATE, MXC_CCM_CBCDR, 0, 3);
>
> becomes,
>
> +static DEFINE_CLK_DIVIDER(perclk_pred1, &perclk_lp_apm.clk, 0,
> MXC_CCM_CBCDR, 6, 2, &imx_ccm_lock);
> +static DEFINE_CLK_DIVIDER(perclk_pred2, &perclk_pred1.clk, 0,
> MXC_CCM_CBCDR, 3, 3, &imx_ccm_lock);
> +static DEFINE_CLK_DIVIDER(perclk_podf, &perclk_pred2.clk,
> CLK_PARENT_SET_RATE, MXC_CCM_CBCDR, 0, 3, &imx_ccm_lock);
understood.
Thanks
Richard
>
> Regards,
> Mike
>
> >
> > Thanks for review
> > Richard
> >>
> >> Thanks,
> >> Mike
> >>
> >> _______________________________________________
> >> linux-arm-kernel mailing list
> >> linux-arm-kernel at lists.infradead.org
> >> http://lists.infradead.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-arm-kernel
> >>
> >
> >
>
> _______________________________________________
> linux-arm-kernel mailing list
> linux-arm-kernel at lists.infradead.org
> http://lists.infradead.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-arm-kernel
>
More information about the linux-arm-kernel
mailing list