[PATCH V2] arm/tegra: convert tegra20 to GIC devicetree binding
robherring2 at gmail.com
Tue Nov 29 14:52:27 EST 2011
On 11/29/2011 11:47 AM, Cousson, Benoit wrote:
> On 11/29/2011 6:13 PM, Stephen Warren wrote:
>> Cousson, Benoit wrote at Tuesday, November 29, 2011 6:01 AM:
>>> Hi Stephen& Peter,
>>> On 11/29/2011 1:54 AM, Stephen Warren wrote:
>>>> From: pdeschrijver at nvidia.com<pdeschrijver at nvidia.com>
>>>> @@ -125,6 +131,14 @@ void __init tegra_init_irq(void)
>>>> gic_arch_extn.irq_unmask = tegra_unmask;
>>>> gic_arch_extn.irq_retrigger = tegra_retrigger;
>>>> - gic_init(0, 29, IO_ADDRESS(TEGRA_ARM_INT_DIST_BASE),
>>>> - IO_ADDRESS(TEGRA_ARM_PERIF_BASE + 0x100));
>>>> +#ifdef CONFIG_OF
>>>> + /* Check if there is a devicetree present as of_irq_init doesn't
>>>> + * indicate if an interrupt controller node was found.
>>>> + */
>>>> + if (of_find_node_by_path("/"))
>>>> + of_irq_init(tegra_irq_match);
>>>> + else
>>> For the same kind of need, I found the following API:
>>> Moreover, it returns false if !CONFIG_OF, so it will avoid the #ifdef.
>> That sounds like a great idea. Unfortunately, of_irq_init() is a DT-only
>> function. Exynos has the following in mainline to solve this:
>> if (!of_have_populated_dt())
>> #ifdef CONFIG_OF
>> Perhaps we should add a dummy of_irq_init() too, so that we can remove
>> this ifdef.
> Yes, indeed, I think that's much better. Most of_XXX APIs do have a
> dummy version, but for some reason some of them do not.
> That one clearly deserve a dummy version.
I had an empty version originally and removed it based on Grant's review...
The original intent was this call should be in a DT board file and
therefore always enabled. Perhaps you can split tegra_init_irq into 2
functions with one having all but gic_init and then call that function
from board-dt.c along with of_irq_init.
More information about the linux-arm-kernel