[PATCH v2 2/4] ARM: vexpress: Add DT support in v2m

[Dave Martin]

On Mon, Nov 28, 2011 at 10:54:22AM +0000, Pawel Moll wrote:
> On Fri, 2011-11-25 at 16:18 +0000, Dave Martin wrote:
> > [Since this text is now stable enough to be proofread, I'll list minor
> > pedantic nits along with the other comments -- they aren't vital to the
> > meaning though, and the documentation still "works" if they aren't
> > acted on.]
> 
> [snip]
> 
> Most appreciated! I'll "process" all your suggestions, thanks!
> 
> > > @@ -50,10 +55,34 @@ static void __iomem *v2m_sysreg_base;
> > >
> > >  static void __init v2m_timer_init(void)
> > >  {
> > > -     void __iomem *sysctl_base;
> > > -     void __iomem *timer01_base;
> > > +     void __iomem *sysctl_base = NULL;
> > > +     void __iomem *timer01_base = NULL;
> > > +     unsigned int timer01_irq = NO_IRQ;
> > > +
> > > +     if (of_have_populated_dt()) {
> > > +#if defined(CONFIG_ARCH_VEXPRESS_DT)
> > > +             int err;
> > > +             const char *path;
> > > +             struct device_node *node;
> > > +
> > > +             node = of_find_compatible_node(NULL, NULL, "arm,sp810");
> > > +             if (node)
> > > +                     sysctl_base = of_iomap(node, 0);
> > > +
> > > +             err = of_property_read_string(of_aliases, "timer", &path);
> > > +             if (!err)
> > > +                     node = of_find_node_by_path(path);
> > > +             if (node) {
> > > +                     timer01_base = of_iomap(node, 0);
> > > +                     timer01_irq = irq_of_parse_and_map(node, 0);
> > > +             }
> > > +#endif
> > > +     } else {
> > > +             sysctl_base = ioremap(V2M_SYSCTL, SZ_4K);
> > > +             timer01_base = ioremap(V2M_TIMER01, SZ_4K);
> > > +             timer01_irq = IRQ_V2M_TIMER0;
> > > +     }
> > 
> > Do we even have of_have_populated_dt() in a non-DT kernel?
> > 
> > Maybe change this to
> > 
> > #if defined(CONFIG_ARCH_VEXPRESS_DT)
> >         if (of_have_populated_dt()) {
> >                 /* ... */
> >         } else
> > #endif
> >         /* follow on from previous else */
> >         {
> >                 /* ... */
> >         }
> > 
> > ...or if that feels a little unclear, maybe do this:
> > 
> > #if defined(CONFIG_ARCH_VEXPRESS_DT)
> >         if (of_have_populated_dt()) {
> >                 /* ... */
> >         } else {
> > #else
> >         {
> > #endif
> >                 /* ... */
> >         }
> 
> of_have_populated_dt() is safe, see "include/linux/of.h":

You're right, but this code is still making assumptions about the
relationship between a build-time option (defined(
CONFIG_ARCH_VEXPRESS_DT)) and a run-time condition
(of_have_populated_dt()).  The relationship between the two is far from
transparent.

The effective condition we want is if(of_have_populated_dt()
&& defined(CONFIG_ARCH_VEXPRESS_DT)).  This is implemented in my
versions, but in your case the code can compile as

if(of_have_populated_dt()) { } else {
	sysctl_base = ioremap(V2M_SYSCTL, SZ_4K);
	...
}

I don't believe we should be writing code which can compile as
if(condition) { } else { do something useful; } unless there are
scenarios under which executing that empty block (and skipping the else)
would be the correct thing to do.  In this code, that's never the
right thing.  

I don't know how likely this is to be an issue, but we should avoid 
putting too many booby-traps in the code for future maintainers.

Since you have the #ifdef anyway, I don't see a strong argument against
moving it into the correct place.

> #ifdef CONFIG_OF 
> static inline bool of_have_populated_dt(void)
> {       
>         return allnodes != NULL;
> }       
> #else /* CONFIG_OF */
> static inline bool of_have_populated_dt(void)
> {       
>         return false;
> }       
> #endif /* CONFIG_OF */
> 
> > > @@ -63,20 +92,20 @@ static void __init v2m_timer_init(void)
> > >               writel(scctrl, sysctl_base + SCCTRL);
> > >       }
> > >
> > > -     timer01_base = ioremap(V2M_TIMER01, SZ_4K);
> > > -     WARN_ON(!timer01_base);
> > > -     if (timer01_base) {
> > > +     WARN_ON(!timer01_base || timer01_irq != NO_IRQ);
> > 
> > Is that supposed to be !timer01_base || timer01_irq == NO_IRQ ?
> 
> Yes, I spotted and fixed this in the mean time.
> 
> > If so, is might be better to write
> > 
> > WARN_ON(!(expr));
> > if (expr) {
> >         ...
> > 
> > so that the conditions are clear inverses.
> 
> Good point, will do.
> 
> > > @@ -470,3 +499,99 @@ MACHINE_START(VEXPRESS, "ARM-Versatile Express")
> > >       .timer          = &v2m_timer,
> > >       .init_machine   = v2m_init,
> > >  MACHINE_END
> > 
> > It would be useful to have a comment somewhere indicating that the
> > DT_MACHINE_START() entries live in the corresponding ct-*.c files for
> > DT-enabled coretiles.
> > 
> > Not essential, though ... most people do know how to use grep.
> 
> Where exactly would you see that comment?

Next to the MACHINE_START() probably makes sense.  That was the point at
which I wondered where the DT equivalent(s) were.

Cheers
---Dave