[PATCH] ARM: vic: register the VIC for ST-modified VIC's
Jamie Iles
jamie at jamieiles.com
Wed Nov 23 10:43:33 EST 2011
On Wed, Nov 23, 2011 at 04:39:26PM +0100, Linus Walleij wrote:
> On 11/23/2011 04:28 PM, Jamie Iles wrote:
> >When probing the VIC, the ST variant has a different probing method to
> >account for the extra interrupts which meant we didn't previously call
> >vic_register() which registered the irq_domain.
> >
> >Cc: Linus Walleij<linus.walleij at stericsson.com>
> >Cc: Russell King<rmk+linux at arm.linux.org.uk>
> >Cc: Marc Zyngier<marc.zyngier at arm.com>
> >Signed-off-by: Jamie Iles<jamie at jamieiles.com>
> >---
> >
> >I _think_ it's just Nomadik affected here which I don't have access to.
> >I can send an updated pull request or put it in Russell's tracker,
> >whichever is easiest.
>
> This also affects mach-u300 and mach-ep93xx OTOH.
>
> This seems to be based on something else that is out-of-tree
> so I don't get the whole picture...
Sorry, should have specified the base - this is the VIC device
tree/MULTI_IRQ_HANDLER stuff that is in next. I did look at u300 and
ep93xx, but it looks like their VIC's are 0x1000/0x10000 apart
respectively when registered so weren't the ST type that supported 64
IRQ's.
Jamie
More information about the linux-arm-kernel
mailing list