[PATCH] ARM: OMAP: dmtimer: fix missing content/correction in low-power mode support
DebBarma, Tarun Kanti
tarun.kanti at ti.com
Wed Nov 23 07:33:09 EST 2011
On Mon, Nov 21, 2011 at 10:12 PM, Ramirez Luna, Omar
<omar.ramirez at ti.com> wrote:
> Hi,
>
> On Tue, Nov 8, 2011 at 12:00 AM, Tarun Kanti DebBarma
> <tarun.kanti at ti.com> wrote:
>> Since omap_dm_timer_write_reg/__omap_dm_timer_write is now modified
>> to use timer->func_base OCP_CFG should not use this wrapper anymore.
>> Instead use __raw_writel() directly and use timer->io_base instead
>> to write to OCP_CFG.
>>
>> The timer->sys_stat is valid only if timer->revision is 1. In the
>> context restore function make this correction.
>>
>> Save the contexts and loss count when timer is stopped.
>> Also, disable the clock. Else, clock usecount would become imbalanced.
>>
>> Signed-off-by: Tarun Kanti DebBarma <tarun.kanti at ti.com>
> ...
>> diff --git a/arch/arm/plat-omap/dmtimer.c b/arch/arm/plat-omap/dmtimer.c
>> index af3b92b..f042c82 100644
>> --- a/arch/arm/plat-omap/dmtimer.c
>> +++ b/arch/arm/plat-omap/dmtimer.c
> ...
>> @@ -357,6 +357,21 @@ int omap_dm_timer_stop(struct omap_dm_timer *timer)
>>
>> __omap_dm_timer_stop(timer, timer->posted, rate);
>>
>> + if (timer->loses_context) {
>> + if (timer->get_context_loss_count)
>
> Maybe: if (timer->loses_context && timer->get_context_loss_count)
Sure.
>
>> + timer->ctx_loss_count =
>> + timer->get_context_loss_count(&timer->pdev->dev);
>
> could get rid of this weird one-line formatting
ok.
>
>> + }
>> +
>> + /*
>> + * Since the register values are computed and written within
>> + * __omap_dm_timer_stop, we need to use read to retrieve the
>> + * context.
>> + */
>> + timer->context.tclr =
>> + omap_dm_timer_read_reg(timer, OMAP_TIMER_CTRL_REG);
>> + timer->context.tisr = __raw_readl(timer->irq_stat);
>> + omap_dm_timer_disable(timer);
>
> FWIW, functionally it looks good to me, besides it fixes the broken
> dmtimer start/stop sequence from 3.2-rc1. Tested with tidspbridge on
> omap3.
Thanks.
>
> If needed:
>
> Tested-by: Omar Ramirez Luna <omar.ramirez at ti.com>
Sure. Thanks.
--
Tarun
>
> Regards,
>
> Omar
>
More information about the linux-arm-kernel
mailing list