[PATCH 03/10] arm/tegra: prepare clock code for multiple tegra variants

Olof Johansson olof at lixom.net
Fri Nov 18 16:25:01 EST 2011


On Fri, Nov 18, 2011 at 12:18 PM, Stephen Warren <swarren at nvidia.com> wrote:
> Olof Johansson wrote at Friday, November 18, 2011 12:07 PM:
>> On Thu, Nov 17, 2011 at 06:19:17PM +0200, Peter De Schrijver wrote:
>> > Rework the tegra20 clock code to support multiple tegra variants :
>> >
>> >  * remove tegra2_periph_reset_assert/tegra2_periph_reset_deassert. This
>> >    functionality should be in clock.c.
>> >  * compile tegra_sdmmc_tap_delay only on tegra20 as this feature will not
>> >    be available in future variants.
>> >  * don't export clk_measure_input_freq as its functionality is also available
>> >    using clk_get_rate().
> ...
>> > @@ -403,10 +405,11 @@ void __init tegra_init_clock(void)
>> >  }
>> >
>> >  /*
>> > - * The SDMMC controllers have extra bits in the clock source register that
>> > - * adjust the delay between the clock and data to compenstate for delays
>> > - * on the PCB.
>> > + * The SDMMC controllers on tegra20 have extra bits in the clock source
>> > + * register that adjust the delay between the clock and data to compenstate
>> > + * for delays on the PCB.
>> >   */
>> > +#ifdef CONFIG_ARCH_TEGRA_2x_SOC
>> >  void tegra_sdmmc_tap_delay(struct clk *c, int delay)
>> >  {
>> >     unsigned long flags;
>> > @@ -415,6 +418,7 @@ void tegra_sdmmc_tap_delay(struct clk *c, int delay)
>> >     tegra2_sdmmc_tap_delay(c, delay);
>> >     spin_unlock_irqrestore(&c->spinlock, flags);
>> >  }
>> > +#endif
>>
>> Ifdeffing this out doesn't quite make sense. Better to do a #ifdef in the
>> include file with an #else case that fills in an empty function. This
>> needs to be abstracted differently for the two platforms anyway but
>> that can be done separately from this. Does tegra3 have tap delay setup
>> as well? (I don't have the TRM handy right now).
>
> I vote just rip this function out altogether.
>
> It isn't used in mainline, chromeos-2.6.38, chromeos-3.0, nor our internal
> 2.6.36 or 2.6.39 kernels.
>
> Equally, I can't find any documentation of the register bits this code
> touches in either Tegra20 or Tegra30 TRMs.

Actually, it used on some of the chromeos platforms, in particular for
the sdio wifi interface (see board-seaboard.c on the chromeos tree).
Without it we don't have stable operation. I'll get the use side
patches posted for it for 3.3.

And yeah. I was unable to find documentation too, it required getting
questions answered from FAEs.


-Olof



More information about the linux-arm-kernel mailing list