[PATCH 3/5] ARM: vexpress: Add DT support in v2m

Dave Martin dave.martin at linaro.org
Thu Nov 17 09:41:16 EST 2011


On Thu, Nov 17, 2011 at 01:50:13PM +0000, Pawel Moll wrote:
> On Wed, 2011-11-16 at 17:57 +0000, Dave Martin wrote:
> > > > We should specify a list of all the "standard" aliases used by the
> > > > generic motherboard code here, since these are part of the contract
> > > > between each board-specific device tree and the motherboard code.
> > > > 
> > > > Is "timer" the only one, or are there others?
> > > 
> > > One and only. There were more, but I got rid of them.
> > 
> > Are the other alises still used?  If not, we should perhaps get rid of
> > them, or keep them on an as-needed basis only?
> 
> I've included the serialX and i2cX aliases purely because the other
> boards do (including Grant's versatile dts).
> 
> > Since alises are by definition a point of standardisation (otherwise
> > there's no need for an alias) I think they need to be documented alongside
> > bindings wherever we have them.
> 
> You are right, but I think this is out of the vexpress scope. The
> serialX aliases, for example, are already used by some drivers:
> 
>    4   1788  drivers/tty/serial/atmel_serial.c <<atmel_serial_probe>>
>              ret = of_alias_get_id(np, "serial");
>    5   1301  drivers/tty/serial/imx.c <<serial_imx_probe_dt>>
>              ret = of_alias_get_id(np, "serial");
> 
> so it sounds like a generic policy-to-be-made.

OK, it makes sense to follow other boards in that case.  This could be
a topic for separate discussion, but I agree it's probably out of scope
here.

> > > > For "non-interactive" config items, can we still please have comments
> > > > indicating what the item means and how it should be used?
> > > > 
> > > > Such comments can be very brief, but having at least something makes the
> > > > configs easier to understand and maintain, in my view.
> > > 
> > > Em, what bits do you refer to? The lines you quoted are not changed...
> > 
> > Hmmm, editing snafu there.
> > 
> > I think I was referring to the ARCH_VEXPRESS_DT item, which is defined
> > just after the lines I quoted.
> 
> Ok, will do.

Cheers
---Dave



More information about the linux-arm-kernel mailing list