[PATCH v5 4/7] arm: omap4: hwmod: introduce emu hwmod

[Will Deacon]

On Fri, Nov 11, 2011 at 11:47:35AM +0000, Jamie Iles wrote:
> On Fri, Nov 11, 2011 at 11:41:47AM +0000, Will Deacon wrote:
> > The issue stems from the fact that we have to route the PMU interrupts to
> > the correct CPU manually (I think only MSM routes them as PPIs, which is
> > clearly the correct thing to do). To do this, we expect the IRQ resources to
> > be laid out in CPU order. In hindsight, maybe naming the resources might
> > have been a good idea, but them we'd still have to generate the names using
> > CPU numbers when iterating through the platform device.
> 
> There isn't yet a way to do naming of resources with DT, and although I 
> think there was a proposal for doing named register resources I don't 
> think this has been accepted and there wasn't anything for IRQ 
> resources...

That's good news - means I have an excuse other than laziness for not
implementing this for perf :)

Will