[PATCH v6 0/5] Basic ARM devicetree support
Nicolas Pitre
nicolas.pitre at linaro.org
Thu May 12 03:47:20 EDT 2011
On Wed, 11 May 2011, Russell King - ARM Linux wrote:
> On Wed, May 11, 2011 at 10:44:49PM +0200, Grant Likely wrote:
> > Right now it merges cleanly with linux-next and the resulting tree
> > builds and boots at least on qemu. Unless you really object, I'm
> > going to ask Stephen to add the following branch to the /end/ of the
> > list of trees for linux-next so it can easily be dropped it if it
> > causes any problems.
>
> As far as the set of five patches looks fine to me, I don't have any
> objections against them. So I think we can merge them for .40.
>
> What I've always worried about is the platform stuff, and that's
> something I'm going to continue worrying about because I don't think
> we have sufficient review capacity to ensure that we don't end up
> with lots of stupidities.
DT is certainly not a silver bullet. Good judgement will be needed as
to what is put in DT and how it is represented. I don't think that it
would make things worse than they are now though.
I also do have some concerns about some aspects of DT which I've
expressed several times in the past. However I don't think holding back
those patches any longer is a solution though.
So consider this as a ACK from my part to merge those patches now. This
will get the ball rolling.
Nicolas
More information about the linux-arm-kernel
mailing list