[PATCH] usb/gadget: at91sam9g20 fix end point max packet size

Greg KH greg at kroah.com
Tue May 10 13:05:00 EDT 2011


On Tue, May 10, 2011 at 05:50:38PM +0200, Jean-Christophe PLAGNIOL-VILLARD wrote:
> On 19:43 Tue 10 May     , Sergei Shtylyov wrote:
> > Hello.
> > 
> > Jean-Christophe PLAGNIOL-VILLARD wrote:
> > 
> > >on 9g20 they are the same as the 9261
> > 
> > >Signed-off-by: Jean-Christophe PLAGNIOL-VILLARD <plagnioj at jcrosoft.com>
> > >---
> > > drivers/usb/gadget/at91_udc.c |    2 +-
> > > 1 files changed, 1 insertions(+), 1 deletions(-)
> > 
> > >diff --git a/drivers/usb/gadget/at91_udc.c b/drivers/usb/gadget/at91_udc.c
> > >index 9b7cdb1..41dc093 100644
> > >--- a/drivers/usb/gadget/at91_udc.c
> > >+++ b/drivers/usb/gadget/at91_udc.c
> > >@@ -1767,7 +1767,7 @@ static int __init at91udc_probe(struct platform_device *pdev)
> > > 	}
> > > 	/* newer chips have more FIFO memory than rm9200 */
> > >-	if (cpu_is_at91sam9260()) {
> > >+	if (cpu_is_at91sam9260() || cpu_is_at91sam9g20()) {
> > 
> >    These shouldn't be used in the drivers at all.
> Sorry this is a bug fix for the current rc and 2.6.38 and older stable tree

How could I apply this to the tree for the .40 release then?

confused,

greg k-h



More information about the linux-arm-kernel mailing list