genirq: Generic irq chip available in git

Mark Brown broonie at opensource.wolfsonmicro.com
Sun May 8 10:03:45 EDT 2011


On Sun, May 08, 2011 at 03:00:23PM +0100, Russell King - ARM Linux wrote:
> On Sun, May 08, 2011 at 02:35:30PM +0100, Mark Brown wrote:

> > Would it not make sense to go ahead and apply all the patches that
> > maintainers already acked?  I rather suspect many people had thought
> > that Thomas' future pushes of the code would also include the patches
> > that they'd already approved and haven't realised that they need to
> > manually push the patches to you.

> Which involves me having to read through the entire thread yet again to
> figure out what state each patch is at, save them out, edit them to add
> each ack to relevant patches, copy the lot to another machine, and then
> apply them.

> The workload there is on the wrong person.

Yeah, I'd actually have expected Thomas to have done this when he pushed
the patches to you to be honest - certainly if I were one of the
relevant maintainers I'd have been surprised that the patches got
dropped.



More information about the linux-arm-kernel mailing list