[RFC PATCH] arm: drop Execute-In-Place
Nicolas Pitre
nicolas.pitre at linaro.org
Thu May 5 15:27:06 EDT 2011
On Thu, 5 May 2011, Tim Bird wrote:
> On 05/05/2011 12:04 PM, Mike Frysinger wrote:
> > On Thu, May 5, 2011 at 14:54, Nicolas Pitre wrote:
> >> On Thu, 5 May 2011, Tim Bird wrote:
> >>> On 05/05/2011 11:32 AM, David Woodhouse wrote:
> >>>> On Thu, 2011-05-05 at 11:03 -0700, Tim Bird wrote:
> >>>>> On 05/05/2011 11:00 AM, Tim Bird wrote:
> >>>>>> On 05/05/2011 07:52 AM, Jean-Christophe PLAGNIOL-VILLARD wrote:
> >>>>>>> nearly no-one use it, only amop1, pxa and sa1100 implement it
> >>>>>>
> >>>>>> Sony uses this - a lot. Principally we're using this on a NEC
> >>>>>> naviengine part, which is ARM11MPCore based, support for which
> >>>>>> is (sadly) out of tree.
> >>>>
> >>>> If you're out of tree, you don't exist.
> >>>
> >>> Yeah - I know. I guess I should tell NEC we'll drop support
> >>> for their chip and move to another one that supports XIP
> >>> if they don't get their act together. If XIP survives...
> >>
> >> It is easy enough to keep it alive... as long as someone uses it of
> >> course.
> >
> > i think David's point:
> > ... someone <in tree> uses it ...
>
> I should add that I tried to use XIP on omap (for research purposes),
> but it was broken and I didn't have time to fix it. My bad.
OMAP is doing pretty nasty things with their early serial port support.
This is most likely to screw up XIP.
> If anyone is using XIP on in-tree platforms, I'd like to hear
> about it.
>
> As for in-tree-ness - I thought the most recent message was to stay
> out of tree until the refactoring was over. ;-)
Just to be clear... We have XIP in the tree already. If it is useful
to someone, in-tree or out-of-tree, then it is worth keeping around.
Even if the only user was out-of-tree which certainly wasn't the case
when I added XIP support to the kernel, then ripping it out and adding
it back later would be more trouble than preserving it.
What I was asking recently is whether or not XIP is still useful to
someone today. Apparently it is, which is the answer I was looking for.
Nicolas
More information about the linux-arm-kernel
mailing list